Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add agency-skills/agency-skills-b --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agency-skills/agency-skills-bWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agency-skills/agency-skills-b/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agency-skills/agency-skills-b/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agency-skills/agency-skills-b/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agency-skills/agency-skills-b/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agency-skills/agency-skills-b/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 106 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A c0d3376dac8a
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository agency-skills/agency-skills-b (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 561 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Systematic code review for bugs, security, style, and performance.
plugin-quality
A review guide for checking Zhin.js plugins before release. It covers plugin structure, feature declarations, resource cleanup, message sending, and security.
代码审查员
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, security, maintainability, performance, and test coverage.
rust-skills
Comprehensive Rust coding guidelines with 265 rules across 26 categories. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Rust code. Covers ownership, error handling, async patterns, concurrency, unsafe code, API design, memory optimization, performance, numeric safety, conversions, serde, pattern matching, macros…
code-review
Structured code review prompt with language and focus area.
pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request and post one formal review — advance the existing discussion and give precision-first, high-signal feedback. Judgement on the diff, not a build gate — CI validates that it builds, and a targeted probe is allowed as evidence. Use when asked to review a PR or on a cron PR scan.