Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to agent-sh/agentsys. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/agent-sh/agentsys/main/.kiro/skills/orchestrate-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agent-sh/agentsysWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agent-sh/agentsys/orchestrate-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agent-sh/agentsys/orchestrate-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agent-sh/agentsys/orchestrate-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.02499 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00500 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00250 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrate-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 261 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Orchestrate Review
Multi-pass code review with parallel Task agents, finding aggregation, and iteration until clean.
Scope-Based Specialist Selection
Select conditional specialists based on the review scope:
- User request: Detect signals from content user refers to (files, directory, module)
- Workflow (Phase 9): Detect signals from changed files only
- Project audit: Detect signals from project structure as a whole
Review Passes
Spawn parallel general-purpose Task agents (model: sonnet), one per pass:
Core (Always)
const corePasses = [
{ id: 'code-quality', role: 'code quality reviewer',
focus: ['Style and consistency', 'Best practices', 'Bugs and logic errors', 'Error handling', 'Maintainability', 'Duplication'] },
{ id: 'security', role: 'security reviewer',
focus: ['Auth/authz flaws', 'Input validation', 'Injection risks', 'Secrets exposure', 'Insecure defaults'] },
{ id: 'performance', role: 'performance reviewer',
focus: ['N+1 queries', 'Blocking operations', 'Hot path inefficiencies', 'Memory leaks'] },
{ id: 'test-coverage', role: 'test coverage reviewer',
focus: ['Missing tests', 'Edge case coverage', 'Test quality', 'Integration needs', 'Mock appropriateness'] }
];
Conditional (Signal-Based)
if (signals.hasDb) passes.push({ id: 'database', role: 'database specialist',
focus: ['Query performance', 'Indexes/transactions', 'Migration safety', 'Data integrity'] });
if (signals.needsArchitecture) passes.push({ id: 'architecture', role: 'architecture reviewer',
focus: ['Module boundaries', 'Dependency direction', 'Cross-layer coupling', 'Pattern consistency'] });
if (signals.hasApi) passes.push({ id: 'api', role: 'api designer',
focus: ['REST conventions', 'Error/status consistency', 'Pagination/filters', 'Versioning'] });
if (signals.hasFrontend) passes.push({ id: 'frontend', role: 'frontend specialist',
focus: ['Component boundaries', 'State management', 'Accessibility', 'Render performance'] });
if (signals.hasBackend) passes.push({ id: 'backend', role: 'backend specialist',
focus: ['Service boundaries', 'Domain logic', 'Concurrency/idempotency', 'Background job safety'] });
if (signals.hasDevops) passes.push({ id: 'devops', role: 'devops reviewer',
focus: ['CI/CD safety', 'Secrets handling', 'Build/test pipelines', 'Deploy config'] });
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 261 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A e815e697aa6c
orchestrate-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository agent-sh/agentsys (982 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,499 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autopilot
Full autonomous execution from idea to working code.
ralplan
Consensus planning entrypoint that auto-gates vague ralph/autopilot/team requests before execution.
deep-interview
Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity gating before explicit execution approval.
remember
Review reusable project knowledge and decide what belongs in project memory, notepad, or durable docs.
plannotator-annotate
Open Plannotator's annotation UI for a file, folder, or URL, then address the returned annotations.
southwest
Search Southwest Airlines fares and points pricing via Patchright browser automation. SW is not in any GDS or API. Covers all fare classes, Companion Pass value, and fare drop monitoring.