Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to agentdecksdk/agentdeck. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/agentdecksdk/agentdeck/dev/.claude/skills/ship-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentdecksdk/agentdeckWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentdecksdk/agentdeck/ship-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentdecksdk/agentdeck/ship-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentdecksdk/agentdeck/ship-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentdecksdk/agentdeck/ship-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentdecksdk/agentdeck/ship-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01784 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00714 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00357 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
ship-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ship a PR
Design the diff before writing it. The design binds nothing by itself, so Stage 1 stops and waits for the orchestrator to check it against the brief before Stage 2 touches source. Self-review is a checklist, not reflection: an unanswered question fails the stage, same as an unrun command.
Checklist
Copy this into your own response and check off each stage as you complete it:
Ship progress:
- [ ] 0. Understand: spec gate, engineering docs, seed the worktree
- [ ] 1. Design: PR body sections, then stop and wait for the design gate
- [ ] 2. Implement: match the analog, stay in budget (references/implement.md)
- [ ] 3. Self-review: the standard, ten shape questions, the coverage question (references/self-review.md)
- [ ] 4. Gate: make check green, gh pr ready
Freedom per stage
Thinking is high freedom. Verification and output are low: a checklist or a template you improvise is not one.
| stage | freedom | why |
|---|---|---|
| 0 Understand | LOW on the spec gate, HIGH on reading | the gate is binary: Done when and scope bounds present, or stop and comment |
| 1 Design | LOW on format, HIGH on content | CI parses the budget block; what argument goes in it is judgment |
| 2 Implement | HIGH | open field. Over-specifying here does real damage, and the issue this skill ships from puts it out of scope |
| 3 Self-review | LOW | a checklist you can improvise is not a checklist |
| 4 Gate | LOW | exact commands, fragile sequence |
Register
Every instruction below, and in references/, carries exactly one of these:
| register | wording | carries |
|---|---|---|
| CONSTRAINT | MUST / NEVER | what breaks if violated, named alongside it |
| EXPECTATION | "the reviewer checks X" | which finding class the miss earns |
| JUDGMENT | "default is X, deviate when Y" | nothing; your call |
A CONSTRAINT without a stated consequence is a preference, not a CONSTRAINT: rewrite it or demote it.
Stages
| stage | freedom / register | does | writes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0. Understand | LOW / CONSTRAINT on the gate | Read the issue as spec. Spec gate below. Seed the worktree. | nothing, or a gate comment |
| 1. Design | LOW / CONSTRAINT on format | PR body sections, then stop. references/design.md |
draft PR, then wait |
| 2. Implement | HIGH / JUDGMENT | Match the analog, stay in budget, test what the change exposes. references/implement.md |
source, tests, CHANGELOG |
| 3. Self-review | LOW / CONSTRAINT | The standard (major features), ten shape questions, the coverage question, answered in writing. references/self-review.md |
the answers, visible in your response |
| 4. Gate | LOW / CONSTRAINT | make check green, compact the body, gh pr ready. Below. |
ready PR |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 65e6fb38d5f2
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 7dc68592a4a9
- 2mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ef2bb978d60d
ship-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository agentdecksdk/agentdeck (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,784 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-triage-and-summary
Turn a change set into a concise implementation and risk summary.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
agent-framework-py-release
Use when cutting a Python release for the microsoft/agent-framework monorepo. Triggers on "bump py versions", "cut a python release", "prepare release PR for python", "release py packages", "bump python to X.Y.Z", or similar requests to bump Python package versions and prepare a release PR. Handles all four lifecycle…
gh-issues
Fetch GitHub issues, spawn sub-agents to implement fixes and open PRs, then monitor and address PR review comments. Usage: /gh-issues [owner/repo] [--label bug] [--limit 5] [--milestone v1.0] [--assignee @me] [--fork user/repo] [--watch] [--interval 5] [--reviews-only] [--cron] [--dry-run] [--model glm-5]…
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…