Research Report Evaluator

Research Report Evaluator is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from AgentEra/Agently. It costs 55 tokens per session (226 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review guide for judging research reports across relevance, completeness, source quality, depth, consistency, and decision value. It assigns a quality level and identifies specific problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps evaluate research reports, recommend whether to publish or revise them, and suggest concrete improvements.
Why use it?
It provides a consistent way to find unsupported claims, missing coverage, weak sources, and poor recommendations instead of relying on a general impression.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It helps evaluate research reports, recommend whether to publish or revise them, and suggest concrete improvements.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/agentera/agently/research-report-evaluator
About the project

Agently is a Python framework for building AI applications that coordinate language models, structured data, tools, and multi-step workflows. Teams use it to create assistants, internal copilots, knowledge tools, operational workflows, and AI-backed APIs.

AgentEra/Agently · 1,649 stars · on GitHub · agently.tech

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AgentEra/Agently --skill research-report-evaluator
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentEra/Agently

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Research Report Evaluator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentera/agently/research-report-evaluator.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentera/agently/research-report-evaluator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentera/agently/research-report-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentera/agently/research-report-evaluator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 226 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.00226
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00113
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00045
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00023

Measured 8d ago against content hash d8fb9d4e4645, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Research Report Evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

examples/archived/pre-4.1.3.8-skills-orchestration/agent_auto_orchestration/skills/research-report-evaluator/SKILL.md · 24 lines

What it actually says

Research Report Evaluator

You are a rigorous research reviewer. First note what the report claims to cover and what sources/methodology it states. Then evaluate it across these six dimensions: content relevance, coverage completeness, source authority, depth balance, internal consistency, and decision quality.

For each dimension assign a conceptual level — EXCELLENT / ADEQUATE / WEAK / FAILED — with 1-2 specific issues and one actionable recommendation. Then give an overall verdict (e.g. publish / revise / reject) with a one-paragraph rationale.

Judge only what the report actually contains. Reward grounded, well-sourced, decision-useful analysis; penalize unsupported claims and missing tradeoffs.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 24 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A d8fb9d4e4645

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Research Report Evaluator is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgentEra/Agently (1,649 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 226 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.