Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AgenticAIPlan/AgenticAISkills --skill eco-partner-registrationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgenticAIPlan/AgenticAISkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenticaiplan/agenticaiskills/eco-partner-registration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenticaiplan/agenticaiskills/eco-partner-registration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenticaiplan/agenticaiskills/eco-partner-registration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenticaiplan/agenticaiskills/eco-partner-registration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenticaiplan/agenticaiskills/eco-partner-registration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00130 | $0.02152 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00065 | $0.01076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
eco-partner-registration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
eco-partner-registration
适用场景
当用户需要将一个产品或合作伙伴纳入飞桨/文心生态体系时，使用本 Skill 执行完整的入库提报流程。
典型触发场景：
- 用户提供了一款产品介绍，需要提交生态产品认证表格
- 需要生成伙伴协议草案并收集对方工商信息
- 同时完成"产品提报 + 协议提报"两件事
- 需要整理归档提报材料文件夹
流程说明： 本 Skill 包含两个阶段，用户可选择只做其中一个，或两个都做（默认两个都做）。执行前先向用户确认执行范围。
关键约束：
- 所有模板文件均存放在工作区的
模板文件夹中，AI 需读取后复制使用 - 无法确定的字段一律留空并标注
[待补充]，不得猜填 - 涉及公司名称、协议期限等关键信息，必须经用户确认后才能定稿
输入要求
- 业务目标：用户要提报的产品/伙伴名称及基本介绍
- 背景上下文：产品功能描述、技术架构、应用场景（可以是文档/PPT/图片/聊天记录等任意形态）
- 关键约束：是否指定生态归属（飞桨/文心）；只做产品提报、只做协议提报，还是两者都做
- 期望输出：填好的认证表格、协议草案、提报邮件草稿、申请理由文本、归档文件夹
前置检查（执行任何步骤前必须完成）
⚠️ 本 Skill 依赖本地模板文件，这些模板不随 Skill 公开分发，需使用者自行准备并放置到工作区的
模板/文件夹中。
在开始执行前，先验证以下六个模板文件是否存在：
ls 模板/
需要确认存在的文件：
| 文件名 | 用途 |
|---|---|
飞桨生态产品认证表格模板.docx |
阶段一 Step 3 使用（归属 = 飞桨时） |
文心生态产品认证表格模板.docx |
阶段一 Step 3 使用（归属 = 文心时） |
产品认证提报邮件模板.docx |
阶段一 Step 4 使用 |
申请理由模板.docx |
阶段二 Step 7 使用 |
飞桨伙伴协议模板.docx |
阶段二 Step 5 使用（归属 = 飞桨时） |
文心伙伴协议模板.docx |
阶段二 Step 5 使用（归属 = 文心时） |
若文件缺失：立即停止流程，告知用户："模板/ 文件夹中缺少以下文件：[列出缺失文件名]，请补充后再继续。"
执行步骤
阶段一：生态产品提报
Step 1：确认执行范围
询问用户：本次执行哪些阶段（仅产品提报 / 仅协议提报 / 两者都做）。
Step 2：判断生态归属
- 根据用户提供的产品介绍，判断属于 飞桨生态产品 还是 文心生态产品
- 不确定时主动询问用户，明确标注：
归属 = 飞桨 / 文心
Step 3：填写产品认证表格
- 根据 Step 2 确认的归属，从
模板/文件夹选取对应模板并复制重命名：- 归属 = 飞桨 → 复制
飞桨生态产品认证表格模板.docx，重命名为{应用名}-飞桨生态AI产品说明.docx - 归属 = 文心 → 复制
文心生态产品认证表格模板.docx，重命名为{应用名}-文心生态AI产品说明.docx - 示例：
智能翻译助手-飞桨生态AI产品说明.docx
- 归属 = 飞桨 → 复制
- 编辑方式：使用
docxSkill（use_skill: docx）读取模板文件，先扫描模板中所有需要填写的空缺位置（包括空白格、占位符、下划线填写区等），再根据用户提供的材料智能提取对应信息逐一填入：- 对每个空缺字段，从用户材料中主动推断最匹配的内容
- 无法从材料中推断的字段，保留空白并标注
[待补充: 字段名] - 不得自行捏造或假设任何信息
- 填写完成后，向用户输出两项内容：① 已填写字段的摘要确认；② 所有
[待补充]字段的清单，逐一说明需要用户补充什么信息。循环修改直到用户回复"确认"
Step 4：生成提报邮件正文
- 从
模板/文件夹找到产品认证提报邮件模板.docx - 根据定稿表格内容生成邮件正文
- 收件人、抄送人留空，并提示用户："请自行填写收件人/抄送人，注意抄送人排序规则"
- 将邮件草稿归档到对应产品文件夹
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 141 lines · 130 tokens per session scan A 18df3ab1a815
eco-partner-registration is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgenticAIPlan/AgenticAISkills (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 130 tokens to every session and 2,152 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-zhangzara-stencil-tablet
A workplace-safety compliance review for a manufacturing regulator — findings, the evidence chain, and the corrective mandate. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for regulator, plant leadership.
treatment-plans
Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and…
handbook-updates
Diff a proposed handbook change against the current version, flag ripple effects and state supplement impacts. Use when user says "update the handbook", "add this to the handbook", "handbook change", or has a policy ready for insertion.
software-copyright-materials
A workflow for creating Chinese application materials for software copyright registration from a real software project.
iflytek-contract-intelligence-review
A contract-review workflow for scanned or digital agreements. It can recognize document text, examine clauses, detect risks, check compliance, and create translation summaries; its output is for review and is not formal legal advice.
legal-writer
Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification…