Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/agenticpawan/fullstack-pilot/azure-container-image-securitynpx skills add AgenticPawan/FullStack-Pilot --skill azure-container-image-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgenticPawan/FullStack-PilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenticpawan/fullstack-pilot/azure-container-image-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenticpawan/fullstack-pilot/azure-container-image-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenticpawan/fullstack-pilot/azure-container-image-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00100 | $0.01450 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00725 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00290 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
azure-container-image-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standard IDs
| ID | Severity | What it checks |
|---|---|---|
| IMG-001 | P0 | No base-image vulnerability scanning in the build pipeline |
| IMG-002 | P0 | Image runs as root with no non-root USER configured |
| IMG-003 | P2 | Full OS base image used where distroless/minimal would shrink the attack surface |
| IMG-004 | P1 | No image-signing/provenance verification before deployment |
azure-aks-governance reviews the pod spec running a container (resource limits,
NetworkPolicy, Workload Identity). This skill reviews the image itself — a perfectly
governed pod spec still inherits every vulnerability baked into an unscanned, root-running
base image.
Check A — No base-image vulnerability scanning (IMG-001)
Detection
Check the CI/CD pipeline (or ACR's built-in scanning, or a dedicated tool like Trivy/ Microsoft Defender for Containers) for an image-scan step that runs before an image is pushed to the registry or deployed. Without one, a known-vulnerable base image (an old Alpine/Debian version with a disclosed CVE) ships to production with nobody having looked.
BAD — image built and pushed with no vulnerability scan
# .github/workflows/build.yml
- run: docker build -t acr.azurecr.io/orders-api:${{ github.sha }} .
- run: docker push acr.azurecr.io/orders-api:${{ github.sha }}
# No scan step — a base image with known CVEs ships straight to the registry.
GOOD — scan gate before push, findings routed the same way as other vulnerability findings
- run: docker build -t acr.azurecr.io/orders-api:${{ github.sha }} .
- name: Scan image
uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master
with:
image-ref: acr.azurecr.io/orders-api:${{ github.sha }}
severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH'
exit-code: '1' # fails the build on critical/high findings — same severity bar as dependency-supply-chain
- run: docker push acr.azurecr.io/orders-api:${{ github.sha }} # only reached if the scan passed
Or, if ACR is the registry, enable Microsoft Defender for Containers' continuous registry scanning as a defense-in-depth complement to the build-time gate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 150 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 3c26ce472a45
azure-container-image-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgenticPawan/FullStack-Pilot (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,450 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
awesome-kubernetes-ops
This skill documents the local verification, editing, and deployment procedures for the Antigravity AI Agent when pair-programming with the repository maintainer.
aspire-stop
Stop the .NET Aspire AppHost and its Docker containers via the developer CLI. Defaults to the current worktree; supports stopping all worktrees or a specific base port.
container-apps-deployment
Container Apps deployment gotchas and SPA frontend patterns for Azure. Supplements the official azure-prepare plugin skill with additional patterns for zone redundancy, azure.yaml configuration, and SPA frontend deployment (VITEAPIURL). USE FOR: Container Apps zone redundancy errors, managed-identity ACR pulls…
n8n-azure
Application-specific configuration for deploying n8n to Azure Container Apps with PostgreSQL. Infrastructure should be generated fresh by the azure-prepare → azure-validate → azure-deploy pipeline.
aks-cluster-setup
Make the AKS-specific design decisions for a new production Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster — SKU (Automatic vs Standard), pod IP model (Azure CNI Overlay vs kubenet), API-server access, egress, identity, upgrades, node pools, and reliability — then delegate the actual provisioning to the Azure Skills…
docker-compose
Multi-container Docker applications with docker-compose — define services, networks, volumes, and orchestrate local development environments.