Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add agentproto/ts --skill ap-policiesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentproto/tsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentproto/ts/ap-policies)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentproto/ts/ap-policies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentproto/ts/ap-policies/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentproto/ts/ap-policies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentproto/ts/ap-policies.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.01067 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00427 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
ap-policies scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Completion Policies
When to use
Use ap-policies to gate a session (or fan-in group) at turn-end by an
objective check — a shell command's exit code or a judge sub-agent's verdict
— instead of trusting the agent's own "done" claim, and/or to auto-commit
once that gate is green, pending an explicit human ack.
MCP tool: policy_attach
Attach a gate to one sessionId, or a sessionIds array for a fan-in group
(the policy resolves once ALL sessions in the group reach turn-end). The gate
is either a shell command (basename must be allowlisted, see ap-run-command)
or a judge adapter + prompt. then decides what happens on pass: emit
(just publish policy:passed) or commit (stage + commit specific paths,
gated by requireHumanAck). onFail controls retries with a nudge prompt.
next chains another policy as a DAG.
{
"tool": "policy_attach",
"args": {
"sessionIds": ["sess_a1b2", "sess_c3d4"],
"gate": { "command": { "name": "pnpm", "args": ["test:unit"] } },
"then": "commit",
"commit": {
"paths": ["services/api-gateway/src/routes/webhook.ts"],
"message": "fix: validate webhook signature before dispatch",
"requireHumanAck": true
},
"onFail": { "nudge": "tests still red — fix the failing assertions", "maxRetries": 3 }
}
}
Judge gate variant:
{
"tool": "policy_attach",
"args": {
"sessionId": "sess_a1b2",
"gate": {
"judge": {
"adapter": "claude-code",
"prompt": "Does the diff add a test for the new webhook signature check? Answer pass/fail with one reason."
}
},
"then": "emit"
}
}
MCP tools: policy_status / policy_list
policy_status polls state (pending | passed | failed |
awaiting_ack) plus awaitingQuestions — judge follow-ups blocking
resolution. policy_list lists active/recent policies, optionally filtered
by sessionId.
{ "tool": "policy_status", "args": { "policyId": "pol_9f21" } }
{ "tool": "policy_list", "args": { "sessionId": "sess_a1b2" } }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 4f8f1d97b55c
ap-policies is a skill published in the GitHub repository agentproto/ts (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,067 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
diagnose-hard-problem
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard problems, diagnosing bugs and regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test.
resolve-author-fix
Find the root cause, implement a focused fix, and prove behavior with targeted tests and recordings.
deepeval
Use when discussing or working with DeepEval (the python AI evaluation framework).
contract
Outcome-driven Cortex function development — declares a behavioral contract before generation begins, enforces evidence-tiered proof before $ship, and defends against the self-oracle evaluation failure mode.
test-driven-development
Writing code with tests first: RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, reproduce bugs as failing tests before fixing, and avoid testing anti-patterns. Use when implementing behaviour, fixing a defect, or asked to add tests.
iterative-refinement
Disciplined, measurable iteration for a substantial refinement or investigation: loop against verifiable pass/fail conditions, fan work out to subagents, and keep the main context lean. Use when improving something measurable over repeated cycles (tuning a metric or detector, refactoring against a regression bar)…