Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add agentscope-ai/OpenJudge --skill 01-auto-arenagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentscope-ai/OpenJudgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/01-auto-arena)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/01-auto-arena"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/01-auto-arena/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/01-auto-arena"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/01-auto-arena.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.02474 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00990 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00495 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
01-auto-arena scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auto Arena Skill
End-to-end automated model comparison using the OpenJudge AutoArenaPipeline:
- Generate queries — LLM creates diverse test queries from task description
- Collect responses — query all target endpoints concurrently
- Generate rubrics — LLM produces evaluation criteria from task + sample queries
- Pairwise evaluation — judge model compares every model pair (with position-bias swap)
- Analyze & rank — compute win rates, win matrix, and rankings
- Report & charts — Markdown report + win-rate bar chart + optional matrix heatmap
Prerequisites
# Install OpenJudge
pip install py-openjudge
# Extra dependency for auto_arena (chart generation)
pip install matplotlib
Gather from user before running
| Info | Required? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Task description | Yes | What the models/agents should do (set in config YAML) |
| Target endpoints | Yes | At least 2 OpenAI-compatible endpoints to compare |
| Judge endpoint | Yes | Strong model for pairwise evaluation (e.g. gpt-4, qwen-max) |
| API keys | Yes | Env vars: OPENAI_API_KEY, DASHSCOPE_API_KEY, etc. |
| Number of queries | No | Default: 20 |
| Seed queries | No | Example queries to guide generation style |
| System prompts | No | Per-endpoint system prompts |
| Output directory | No | Default: ./evaluation_results |
| Report language | No | "zh" (default) or "en" |
Quick start
CLI
# Run evaluation
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --save
# Use pre-generated queries
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml \
--queries_file queries.json --save
# Start fresh, ignore checkpoint
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --fresh --save
# Re-run only pairwise evaluation with new judge model
# (keeps queries, responses, and rubrics)
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --rerun-judge --save
Python API
import asyncio
from cookbooks.auto_arena.auto_arena_pipeline import AutoArenaPipeline
async def main():
pipeline = AutoArenaPipeline.from_config("config.yaml")
result = await pipeline.evaluate()
print(f"Best model: {result.best_pipeline}")
for rank, (model, win_rate) in enumerate(result.rankings, 1):
print(f"{rank}. {model}: {win_rate:.1%}")
asyncio.run(main())
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 275 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 7b21c707eb70
01-auto-arena is a skill published in the GitHub repository agentscope-ai/OpenJudge (888 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 2,474 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
tinker-fine-tuning
Provides guidance for fine-tuning LLMs using the Tinker cloud training API from Thinking Machines Lab. Use when running supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning (GRPO/PPO), or LoRA training on cloud GPUs via Tinker's managed infrastructure instead of local compute.
llm-as-judge-evaluation
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.
langsmith-observability
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
ceo-setup
One-time onboarding for the executive/manager commitment workflow — delegation-heavy, meeting prep, decision capture, morning and evening digests. Creates a commitments project and installs two dashboard widgets. After successful setup this skill is excluded from selection until the marker file is deleted.
developer-setup
One-time onboarding for the developer workflow — installs github-workflow missions, creates the commitments workspace, registers per-repo projects, writes calibration memories. After successful setup this skill is excluded from selection until the marker file is deleted.
portfolio
Cross-chain DeFi portfolio discovery, rebalancing suggestions, and NEAR Intent construction. Activates when the user pastes a wallet address or asks about yield/positions/rebalancing. Bootstraps a per-user "portfolio" project, aggregates positions across all the user's addresses inside one project, and offers a…