02-ref-hallucination-arena

02-ref-hallucination-arena is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from agentscope-ai/OpenJudge. It costs 101 tokens per session (2,471 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of 03-ref-hallucination-arena, Apache-2.0.

A benchmark for testing whether language models recommend real academic papers. It checks each cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP, which are scholarly reference databases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to test reference recommendations, measure citation error rates, compare models, and create reports and charts.
Why use it?
It exposes made-up citations and inaccurate details such as titles, authors, years, and DOI identifiers.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to test reference recommendations, measure citation error rates, compare models, and create reports and charts.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/02-ref-hallucination-arena
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add agentscope-ai/OpenJudge --skill 02-ref-hallucination-arena
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentscope-ai/OpenJudge

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 02-ref-hallucination-arena

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/02-ref-hallucination-arena/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/02-ref-hallucination-arena)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/02-ref-hallucination-arena"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/02-ref-hallucination-arena/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for 02-ref-hallucination-arena

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/02-ref-hallucination-arena"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/02-ref-hallucination-arena.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 101 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,471 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00101 $0.02471
Opus 5.5 $0.00040 $0.00988
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00494
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00247

Measured 1mo ago against content hash b613955cd8d0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

02-ref-hallucination-arena scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to 03-ref-hallucination-arena — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/arena-eval/02-ref-hallucination-arena/SKILL.md · 261 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 261 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Reference Hallucination Arena Skill

Evaluate how accurately LLMs recommend real academic references using the OpenJudge RefArenaPipeline:

  1. Load queries — from JSON/JSONL dataset
  2. Collect responses — BibTeX-formatted references from target models
  3. Extract references — parse BibTeX entries from model output
  4. Verify references — cross-check against Crossref / PubMed / arXiv / DBLP
  5. Score & rank — compute verification rate, per-field accuracy, discipline breakdown
  6. Generate report — Markdown report + visualization charts

Prerequisites

# Install OpenJudge
pip install py-openjudge

# Extra dependency for ref_hallucination_arena (chart generation)
pip install matplotlib

Gather from user before running

Info Required? Notes
Config YAML path Yes Defines endpoints, dataset, verification settings
Dataset path Yes JSON/JSONL file with queries (can be set in config)
API keys Yes Env vars: OPENAI_API_KEY, DASHSCOPE_API_KEY, etc.
CrossRef email No Improves API rate limits for verification
PubMed API key No Improves PubMed rate limits
Output directory No Default: ./evaluation_results/ref_hallucination_arena
Report language No "en" (default) or "zh"
Tavily API key No Required only if using tool-augmented mode

Quick start

CLI

# Run evaluation with config file
python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml --save

# Resume from checkpoint (default behavior)
python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml --save

# Start fresh, ignore checkpoint
python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml --fresh --save

# Override output directory
python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml \
  --output_dir ./my_results --save

Python API

import asyncio
from cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena.pipeline import RefArenaPipeline

async def main():
    pipeline = RefArenaPipeline.from_config("config.yaml")
    result = await pipeline.evaluate()

    for rank, (model, score) in enumerate(result.rankings, 1):
        print(f"{rank}. {model}: {score:.1%}")

asyncio.run(main())

Read the full file on GitHub · 261 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 261 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A b613955cd8d0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

02-ref-hallucination-arena is a skill published in the GitHub repository agentscope-ai/OpenJudge (888 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 2,471 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to 03-ref-hallucination-arena, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

tinker-fine-tuning

Provides guidance for fine-tuning LLMs using the Tinker cloud training API from Thinking Machines Lab. Use when running supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning (GRPO/PPO), or LoRA training on cloud GPUs via Tinker's managed infrastructure instead of local compute.

synthetic-sciences/openscience · 62 tokens

llm-as-judge-evaluation

Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.

synthetic-sciences/openscience · 56 tokens

langsmith-observability

LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.

synthetic-sciences/openscience · 45 tokens

ceo-setup

One-time onboarding for the executive/manager commitment workflow — delegation-heavy, meeting prep, decision capture, morning and evening digests. Creates a commitments project and installs two dashboard widgets. After successful setup this skill is excluded from selection until the marker file is deleted.

suyoumo/ClawProBench · 60 tokens

developer-setup

One-time onboarding for the developer workflow — installs github-workflow missions, creates the commitments workspace, registers per-repo projects, writes calibration memories. After successful setup this skill is excluded from selection until the marker file is deleted.

suyoumo/ClawProBench · 49 tokens

portfolio

Cross-chain DeFi portfolio discovery, rebalancing suggestions, and NEAR Intent construction. Activates when the user pastes a wallet address or asks about yield/positions/rebalancing. Bootstraps a per-user "portfolio" project, aggregates positions across all the user's addresses inside one project, and offers a…

suyoumo/ClawProBench · 69 tokens