Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AgentSecOps/SecOpsAgentKit --skill dast-zapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentSecOps/SecOpsAgentKitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentsecops/secopsagentkit/dast-zap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentsecops/secopsagentkit/dast-zap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentsecops/secopsagentkit/dast-zap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentsecops/secopsagentkit/dast-zap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentsecops/secopsagentkit/dast-zap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.03631 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.01452 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00726 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00363 |
Grade A, and why
dast-zap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/.gitkeep 221 B
- assets/github_action.yml 6.1 KB
- assets/gitlab_ci.yml 5.9 KB
- assets/zap_automation.yaml 4.8 KB
- assets/zap_context.xml 6.8 KB
- references/api_testing_guide.md 11 KB
- references/authentication_guide.md 11 KB
- references/EXAMPLE.md 809 B
- references/false_positive_handling.md 9.8 KB
- references/owasp_mapping.md 7.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 445 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 6a30d5357ec7
dast-zap is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgentSecOps/SecOpsAgentKit (228 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 3,631 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
performing-jwt-none-algorithm-attack
Execute and test the JWT none algorithm attack to bypass signature verification by manipulating the alg header field in JSON Web Tokens.
security-expert
Expert-level application security, OWASP Top 10, penetration testing, and security best practices. Use when the user mentions OWASP, pentesting, appsec, vulnerability, encryption, or authentication, or when the task involves Security Principles, OWASP Top 10, Security Domains, or Broken Access Control.
dast-config
Reviews DAST tool configurations against OWASP Top 10:2021 and OWASP Testing Guide v4.2. Auto-invoked when reviewing OWASP ZAP configurations, DAST CI/CD integration, scan policies, or authenticated scanning setups. Produces a DAST maturity assessment covering scan policy configuration, active vs passive scanning, API…
exploiting-http-request-smuggling
Detecting and exploiting HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities caused by Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding parsing discrepancies between front-end and back-end servers.
exploiting-idor-vulnerabilities
Identifying and exploiting Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerabilities to access unauthorized resources by manipulating object identifiers in API requests and URLs.
exploiting-insecure-deserialization
Identifying and exploiting insecure deserialization vulnerabilities in Java, PHP, Python, and .NET applications to achieve remote code execution during authorized penetration tests.