agent-wiki-compare-outcomes

agent-wiki-compare-outcomes is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from AgentToolkit/altk-evolve. It costs 64 tokens per session (1,362 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A comparison procedure for successful and failed AI-agent task runs. It uses evidence from multiple recorded trajectories to derive guidelines supported by contrasts rather than by guesswork.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to examine benchmark runs, evaluator results, or similar agent transcripts and produce evidence-backed guidance.
Why use it?
A single run can hide why an agent succeeded or failed. Comparing matched outcomes helps distinguish useful rules from unsupported assumptions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is cat /tmp/contrastive-guideline.json | uv run python explorations/agent-wiki/skills/scripts/build_agent_wiki.py --wiki-root <wiki-root> render-guidelines.

Good fit Use it to examine benchmark runs, evaluator results, or similar agent transcripts and produce evidence-backed guidance.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentToolkit/altk-evolve
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/agenttoolkit/altk-evolve/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agent-wiki-compare-outcomes

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenttoolkit/altk-evolve/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenttoolkit/altk-evolve/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenttoolkit/altk-evolve/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenttoolkit/altk-evolve/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for agent-wiki-compare-outcomes

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenttoolkit/altk-evolve/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenttoolkit/altk-evolve/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 64 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,362 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00064 $0.01362
Opus 5.5 $0.00026 $0.00545
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00272
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00136

Measured 25d ago against content hash 93894472b8c6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-wiki-compare-outcomes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/compare_outcomes.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

explorations/agent-wiki/skills/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes/SKILL.md · 135 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent Wiki — Compare Outcomes

Overview

Use this pass after summarize/extract/synthesize when there are multiple trajectories that can be judged as successful or failed. It can judge outcomes with an LLM from the normalized transcript, so it does not need to depend on benchmark-specific success/failure labels. It derives contrastive guidelines: rules that are supported by a failed path, a successful path, and concrete evidence from task wording, tool/API documentation, tool/API calls, transcript evidence, optional failure snippets, and optionally an LLM success/failure judgment.

This pass exists to avoid hand-authored domain knowledge. Do not write a rule just because you know the benchmark or application. Write a rule only when the input trajectories contain the evidence.

Workflow

Step 1: Build an Evidence Pack

Run the bundled script over normalized trajectory JSON files:

uv run python explorations/agent-wiki/skills/agent-wiki-compare-outcomes/scripts/compare_outcomes.py \
  --input <normalized-dir-or-json> \
  --out-json <analysis.json> \
  --out-md <analysis.md> \
  --judge-outcomes always

Pass --input multiple times to compare several experiment arms.

The script groups traces by metadata.task_id when present; otherwise it uses a normalized task request. For each group it compares successful and failed runs, then extracts:

  • task request text;
  • stored outcome and failure snippets when present;
  • LLM-judged outcome when --judge-outcomes missing or --judge-outcomes always is set;
  • observed tool/API calls from stats.top_tools, code snippets, and source api_calls.jsonl when available;
  • tool/API descriptions shown in the trajectory transcript.

Judging modes:

  • --judge-outcomes never: use only stored outcome.success.
  • --judge-outcomes missing: judge only traces without stored outcomes.
  • --judge-outcomes always: ignore stored success labels and use the LLM judgment for all traces.

Prefer --judge-outcomes always when the available stored labels come from a benchmark evaluator or another dataset-specific schema. Use stored outcomes only when they are trusted, dataset-neutral annotations you are comfortable using as ground truth.

Read the full file on GitHub · 135 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 25d ago First seen · 135 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 93894472b8c6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-wiki-compare-outcomes is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgentToolkit/altk-evolve (124 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,362 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

memory-to-skill

Turn workflows from your MemSearch memory into reusable skills. Use when the user asks to make/create/extract/distill a skill from what they just did or from past work, review skill candidates, install a distilled skill, or 'turn this into a skill'. Manages MemSearch procedural-memory candidates under…

zilliztech/memsearch · 82 tokens

media-gen

Photoreal image + video generation and upscaling via fal.ai (pay-per-use, one API key, always-current models: Kling, Seedance, FLUX, nano-banana Pro, Topaz). Use for image-to-video ("animate this image", "turn this photo into a video"), photoreal video clips for websites/demos, hero video loops, upscaling…

ManceRayder42/jarvis-os · 216 tokens

research-notebook

Deep research on any topic via the NotebookLM CLI. Use whenever the user requests research on a topic, in any project, in any language. Triggers on phrases like "research this", "deep dive on", "do research on", "dig into", "find out about", "investigate", "look into", "research X for me". Creates or reuses a…

ManceRayder42/jarvis-os · 130 tokens

learn

Use when the user shares a conclusion, note, or takeaway from something they're studying — a book, course, or article — and wants it captured into their personal learning archive. Trigger phrases include "what I learned today", "notes from the book", "conclusions from chapter X", plus the explicit /learn command. Also…

ManceRayder42/jarvis-os · 121 tokens

knowledge-pack

Build a durable knowledge pack in the hub for one subject — a small always-read index plus numbered load-on-demand files, every claim sourced and graded. Use when the user says "build a knowledge pack", "make a reference on X", or when you notice you keep re-deriving or re-researching the same subject across sessions.

ManceRayder42/jarvis-os · 72 tokens

wiki-article

Write a wiki article capturing structure you learned about an active project in the user's hub. Use when you grepped or spawned Explore agents to understand a project and must record that knowledge before /done, or when the user asks to "write a wiki article", "document this in the wiki", or "add this to the wiki".

ManceRayder42/jarvis-os · 70 tokens