Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AgentureHQ/agenture-loop --skill docs-syncgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentureHQ/agenture-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/docs-sync)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/docs-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/docs-sync/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/docs-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/docs-sync.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.01287 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00515 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00257 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
docs-sync scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Docs sync (/agn:docs-sync)
Purpose
Every time a work unit closes (task → done, feature close, epic close), taskman.sh appends an entry to tasks/docs-sync-queue.txt and prints a "Doc-sync pending" hint. This skill processes that queue: it reviews upstream docs/* files for drift against each closed unit, proposes diffs, and clears the entry once the user approves.
Follow plugins/agn/rules/doc-maintenance.md for what to check and when no update is needed.
Arguments
| Position | Variable | Value |
|---|---|---|
$1 |
filter | Optional. Without an argument, process all pending entries. With a number, process only that line of the queue (1-indexed). With a slug or path, process only entries matching that id. |
Preconditions
tasks/docs-sync-queue.txtexists. If missing or empty, report "No pending doc-sync entries." and stop.- For each entry being processed, the named unit file must exist (closed task in
tasks/done/, feature intasks/features/, epic intasks/epics/).
Workflow
-
Read the queue — Load
tasks/docs-sync-queue.txt. Each line:<ISO-8601 timestamp> <kind> <id-or-path>kindistask,feature, orepic. For task,id-or-pathis the full path undertasks/done/. For feature/epic, it is the slug.Apply
$1filter if provided. -
For each entry, in order:
a. Load context. Read the closed unit's file. If it carries
feature: <slug>orepic: <slug>, also read the parent. If the closed unit links to a spec underdocs/<area>/.../-spec.md, read that spec.b. Check upstream docs in dependency order (per
rules/doc-maintenance.md):docs/vision.mddocs/spec.mddocs/requirements.mddocs/architecture.md- Linked spec under
docs/<area>/.../-spec.md(if applicable)
For each doc, ask:
- Does the doc state a behavior or intent that the closed work changed or invalidated?
- Does the doc lack a behavior or intent that the closed work now exhibits?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A d551c391104d
docs-sync is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgentureHQ/agenture-loop (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,287 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
connect
Install the scoped Antigravity permission hook.
hook-template
Generate hook script from template. Use when adding a new hook, wiring a PreToolUse/PostToolUse/Stop/Notification hook, or scaffolding hook config for settings.json.
check-environment
Verify Claude, Codex, and Grok availability plus Director guidance, relay, agents, and skills. Audit optional hooks only when selected. Use after installation or when a native surface misbehaves.
agents
List all available agents (core, expert, self-evolving). Use when the user asks what agents are available or runs /agents.
handoff-gemini
Delegate long-context analysis, research, and large-document summarization to Google Gemini CLI (1M-token context) via non-interactive gemini -p, preserving Claude context. Use when the user says 'use gemini'/'hand off to gemini' or a task needs 100K+ tokens of context.
test-runner
Test execution reference: framework detection (pytest/jest/vitest/go/cargo/junit) and correct run/coverage commands, plus failure-analysis steps. Use when running tests, analyzing test failures, or verifying coverage after code changes.