Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aget-framework/aget. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aget-framework/aget/main/.claude/skills/aget-review-artifact/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aget-framework/agetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-artifact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-artifact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-artifact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-artifact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-artifact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00665 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
aget-review-artifact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aget-review-artifact
Review artifacts against defined criteria and produce structured feedback. Supports code, documentation, designs, and plans.
Instructions
When this skill is invoked:
-
Identify Artifact
- Type (code, doc, design, plan)
- Location
- Context
-
Determine Criteria
- Use provided criteria
- Or apply standard criteria for artifact type
- Document criteria used
-
Evaluate
- Assess against each criterion
- Note strengths and issues
- Classify findings
-
Form Recommendation
- Approve: Ready as-is
- Approve with fixes: Minor issues
- Revise: Significant issues
- Reject: Fundamental problems
Standard Criteria by Type
Code:
- Correctness, Readability, Test coverage, Standards
Documentation:
- Accuracy, Completeness, Clarity, Currency
Design:
- Requirements coverage, Feasibility, Quality attributes
Plan:
- Scope clarity, Feasibility, Risk coverage, V-tests
Output Format
## Artifact Review: [Name/Path]
### Artifact Info
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Type | [Code/Doc/Design/Plan] |
| Location | [Path] |
| Reviewer | [Agent] |
| Date | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
---
### Criteria Applied
| Criterion | Weight |
|-----------|--------|
| [Criterion 1] | [High/Med/Low] |
| [Criterion 2] | [High/Med/Low] |
---
### Evaluation
| Criterion | Rating | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| [Criterion 1] | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [Details] |
| [Criterion 2] | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [Details] |
---
### Findings
#### Issues
| Severity | Location | Issue | Suggestion |
|----------|----------|-------|------------|
| Blocking | [Where] | [What] | [How to fix] |
| Suggestion | [Where] | [What] | [Consider] |
#### Strengths
- [Positive observation 1]
- [Positive observation 2]
---
### Recommendation
**Decision**: [Approve / Approve with Fixes / Revise / Reject]
**Rationale**: [Why this decision]
**Required Actions**: (if not Approve)
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 124 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 21809f0d38c2
aget-review-artifact is a skill published in the GitHub repository aget-framework/aget (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 665 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aget-release-critique
Adversarial review with the Critic perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818). Dual-mandate: spec coverage audit + deep bug finding.
aget-close-project
Close a PROJECTPLAN with verifiable-assertion gate (V-tests + commits + retrospective), deferred-surface scan for next-plan handoff, and status transition (ACTIVE → COMPLETE / CLOSED / ABANDONED / SUPERSEDED). Strict counterpart to /aget-create-project (D71 Layer 2). Closes asymmetric verb-pair gap at PROJECTPLAN…
aget-release-audit-specs
Audit specifications with the Spec Auditor perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818). Coverage and consistency mode.
aget-file-issue
File issues with L520 governance compliance.
aget-release-build
Execute gate deliverables with the Builder perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818). Speed-optimized execution mode.
aget-propose-actions
Propose ranked next-best actions with evidence grounding, time budgets, and execute-all default. Formalizes the fleet's highest-frequency interaction pattern.