Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aget-framework/aget. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aget-framework/aget/main/.claude/skills/aget-review-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aget-framework/agetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00584 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00292 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
aget-review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aget-review-pr
Review pull requests for code quality, test coverage, and standards compliance. Produces structured review with categorized comments.
Instructions
When this skill is invoked:
-
Gather PR Information
gh pr view [number] --json title,body,files,additions,deletions gh pr diff [number] -
Analyze Changes
- Code correctness
- Test coverage for changed code
- Standards compliance
- Potential issues
-
Categorize Findings
- Blocking: Must fix before merge
- Suggestion: Should consider
- Nitpick: Minor observation
- Praise: Positive feedback
-
Form Recommendation
- Approve: No blocking issues
- Request Changes: Has blocking issues
- Comment: Questions or suggestions only
Output Format
## PR Review: #[number] - [title]
### Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Files Changed | [N] |
| Additions | +[N] |
| Deletions | -[N] |
| Tests Added | [Y/N] |
### Overall Assessment
**Recommendation**: [Approve / Request Changes / Comment]
**Rationale**: [Brief explanation]
---
### Comments
#### Blocking Issues
1. **[file:line]**: [Issue description]
- Suggestion: [How to fix]
#### Suggestions
1. **[file:line]**: [Suggestion]
- Rationale: [Why consider this]
#### Nitpicks
1. **[file:line]**: [Minor observation]
#### Positive Observations
1. **[file:line]**: [What was done well]
---
### Test Coverage
- [ ] New code has tests
- [ ] Edge cases covered
- [ ] Integration tests updated (if applicable)
### Standards Check
- [ ] Naming conventions followed
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No hardcoded values
Constraints
- C1: NEVER approve PRs with blocking issues — blocking issues must be resolved
- C2: NEVER submit review without user confirmation — user controls GitHub interaction
- C3: NEVER focus solely on style issues — correctness and design more important than formatting
Related
- SKILL-024: aget-review-pr specification
- ONTOLOGY_developer.yaml: Pull_Request, Code_Review concepts
- CAP-DEV-003: PR Review capability
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 111 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A fa285b668c50
aget-review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository aget-framework/aget (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 584 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aget-release-critique
Adversarial review with the Critic perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818). Dual-mandate: spec coverage audit + deep bug finding.
aget-close-project
Close a PROJECTPLAN with verifiable-assertion gate (V-tests + commits + retrospective), deferred-surface scan for next-plan handoff, and status transition (ACTIVE → COMPLETE / CLOSED / ABANDONED / SUPERSEDED). Strict counterpart to /aget-create-project (D71 Layer 2). Closes asymmetric verb-pair gap at PROJECTPLAN…
aget-release-audit-specs
Audit specifications with the Spec Auditor perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818). Coverage and consistency mode.
aget-file-issue
File issues with L520 governance compliance.
aget-release-build
Execute gate deliverables with the Builder perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818). Speed-optimized execution mode.
aget-propose-actions
Propose ranked next-best actions with evidence grounding, time budgets, and execute-all default. Formalizes the fleet's highest-frequency interaction pattern.