Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Agile-V/agile_v_skills --skill safety-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Agile-V/agile_v_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agile-v/agile_v_skills/safety-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agile-v/agile_v_skills/safety-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agile-v/agile_v_skills/safety-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agile-v/agile_v_skills/safety-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agile-v/agile_v_skills/safety-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01044 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
safety-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 64 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 85bbf43f42b0
safety-engineer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Agile-V/agile_v_skills (53 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,044 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agt-policy-authoring
Create and validate a minimal AGT Copilot CLI policy tailored to the repository being inspected.
air-blackbox-sales-agent
AIR Blackbox's autonomous sales prospecting agent. Finds Python AI projects on GitHub that need EU AI Act compliance, identifies the right person to contact (CEO, CTO, lead maintainer), runs a free compliance scan, and drafts personalized outreach emails that convert to engagement. The sales flow: free scan as the…
compliance-scan
Scans a Python AI project for EU AI Act compliance gaps using AIR Blackbox. Use when the user asks to check compliance, scan their code, audit their AI project, or mentions EU AI Act, Articles 9-15, or compliance checking.
interpret-results
Interprets AIR Blackbox scan results and maps findings to specific EU AI Act articles, recitals, and remediation steps. Use when the user has scan output and wants to understand what to fix, why it matters, or how to prioritize.
reviewing-plan-docs
Review planning documents by reading the plan docs and doing a thorough codebase walkthrough, then writing detailed review docs. Use when the user asks to review, audit, critique, or validate a plan, design doc, or spec in the permit0 repository.
writing-plan-docs
Write planning documents for new permit0 features, integrations, or significant changes. Use when the user asks to plan, design, spec, or write a plan for a new integration, pack, feature, or architectural change in the permit0 repository.