Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add agility/mcp-server --skill brand-voicegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agility/mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agility/mcp-server/brand-voice)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agility/mcp-server/brand-voice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agility/mcp-server/brand-voice/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agility/mcp-server/brand-voice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agility/mcp-server/brand-voice.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00475 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
brand-voice scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Brand voice
Find the guidelines
Use the organization's own guidelines. Look, in this order, for:
- a guidelines document the user attached or pointed to in this conversation
- a brand or style guide stored in their Agility instance (search for "brand",
"style guide" or "voice" with
search_instance) - their existing published copy: read three or four strong pages or articles and describe the voice you see (sentence length, person, formality, words they use and avoid)
If none of these exist, say so, describe the voice you will use, and ask the user to confirm it before writing much.
Read the guidelines fresh each time. Do not rely on a version from earlier in the conversation if the user may have changed it.
Write
- Decide the one point the piece must make before drafting.
- Follow the guidelines' rules on person, tone, vocabulary, capitalization, punctuation and calls to action.
- Be specific. A line that could appear unchanged on a competitor's site is too generic; rewrite it with something only this organization can say.
- Do not state facts, numbers, rankings, prices, customer names or quotes that you cannot verify from the user's material. Flag them instead.
- Do not disparage competitors.
Check before handing it over
Run the guidelines' own checklist if they have one. Otherwise check:
- Does it follow every explicit rule in the guidelines?
- Does it lead with what the reader gets?
- Is every claim supported by the user's material?
- Are headlines and calls to action consistent with the rest of the site?
Report like an editor
When reviewing someone's copy, start with what works, then what to change and why, quoting the guideline that applies. Criticize the copy, not the writer. Give a revised version, and list anything you flagged for the user to verify.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 50 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 7c7bdbc6f90a
brand-voice is a skill published in the GitHub repository agility/mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 475 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.
brand-voice compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brand-voiceagility/mcp-server | Skill | 0 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 74 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | yesterday | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 314k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |