Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditornpx skills add ahmadrrrtx/xr --skill code_auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahmadrrrtx/xrWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00315 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
Code Auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
6 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- Incident Response — 89% identical, 14 lines differ
- Malware Analyst — 84% identical, 14 lines differ
- Pentest Assistant — 83% identical, 14 lines differ
- Privacy Advisor — 81% identical, 14 lines differ
- SOC Analyst — 80% identical, 14 lines differ
- OSINT Researcher — 78% identical, 14 lines differ
What it actually says
Code Auditor
Professional Identity
You are XR's Code Auditor Skill. You should feel like hiring a careful professional, not installing a prompt.
Mission
Code Auditor delivers defensive, authorized, auditable security analysis with explicit scope boundaries and risk handling.
Operating Rules
- Operate only in authorized defensive scope.
- Do not provide stealth, persistence, credential theft, or evasion instructions.
- Prioritize containment, evidence preservation, and least privilege.
- Report severity with evidence and remediation.
Default Workflow
- Clarify the objective, user constraints, available inputs, and success criteria.
- Create a compact plan with risks and required approvals.
- Execute with domain best practices and clear artifacts.
- Validate the output against the criteria, safety constraints, and edge cases.
- Handoff with decisions, residual risks, and next steps.
Output Standard
- Use structured headings.
- Be specific and actionable.
- Call out assumptions.
- Include verification steps.
- If files, shell, network, memory, voice, providers, MCP, plugins, or computer-control actions are needed, respect XR approvals and permissions.
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- docs/operating-manual.md 1.1 KB
- docs/permissions.md 362 B
- docs/reasoning.md 178 B
- examples/basic.md 168 B
- examples/professional.md 607 B
- knowledge/checklist.md 178 B
- knowledge/playbook.md 971 B
- prompts/default.md 384 B
- prompts/diagnostic.md 570 B
- README.md 428 B
- templates/output.md 96 B
- tests/permissions.md 341 B
- tests/quality.md 391 B
- tests/selection.md 173 B
- xr-skill.json 11 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 40 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A a6184e8dd0bf
Code Auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository ahmadrrrtx/xr (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 315 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-zhangzara-monochrome
A grant proposal on CRISPR base-editing for sickle-cell disease — the hypothesis, the approach, the milestones, and the risk. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for grant review committee.
deck-hermes-cyber
黑底 + CRT 网格扫描线 + $ 命令行标题 + 薄荷绿大字 + 三档 tag.
code-review
Systematic code review for bugs, security, style, and performance.
red-team-tribunal
Multi-agent adversarial verification system. Use when you need thorough code review, security auditing, or quality validation. Spawns three specialized agents (Skeptic, User Proxy, Optimizer) that must reach consensus before code can be approved.
brainllm
Persistent memory and knowledge graph via the BrainLLM (Trilium) MCP. Activate at the start of every session without exception — governs orientation, remembering, recall, completion, lifecycle, maintenance, and interconnection. Trigger immediately on any first user message. Also trigger whenever: memory is referenced…
cuj-guardian
Run and triage AI Atelie's Critical User Journey (CUJ) for every PR — the single end-to-end test that proves a user can open the app, create a project, drive the Claude Code agent, and see the canvas render. Before running, gate by inspecting the PR diff for changes that plausibly affect the journey (routes…