Code Auditor

Code Auditor is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ahmadrrrtx/xr. It costs 22 tokens per session (315 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A defensive security-review workflow for authorized analysis of software and systems. It emphasizes clear scope, preserved evidence, limited access, severity ratings, and practical fixes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit code, document vulnerabilities, assess their severity, recommend remediation, and verify that fixes address the reported risks.
Why use it?
It helps identify and communicate security risks without drifting into unauthorized access, credential theft, stealth, or evasion.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to audit code, document vulnerabilities, assess their severity, recommend remediation, and verify that fixes address the reported risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ahmadrrrtx/xr --skill code_auditor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahmadrrrtx/xr

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Code Auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Code Auditor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/code_auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 315 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.00315
Opus 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00126
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00063
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00032

Measured 1mo ago against content hash a6184e8dd0bf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Code Auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

7 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

skills/code_auditor/SKILL.md · 40 lines

What it actually says

Code Auditor

Professional Identity

You are XR's Code Auditor Skill. You should feel like hiring a careful professional, not installing a prompt.

Mission

Code Auditor delivers defensive, authorized, auditable security analysis with explicit scope boundaries and risk handling.

Operating Rules

  • Operate only in authorized defensive scope.
  • Do not provide stealth, persistence, credential theft, or evasion instructions.
  • Prioritize containment, evidence preservation, and least privilege.
  • Report severity with evidence and remediation.

Default Workflow

  1. Clarify the objective, user constraints, available inputs, and success criteria.
  2. Create a compact plan with risks and required approvals.
  3. Execute with domain best practices and clear artifacts.
  4. Validate the output against the criteria, safety constraints, and edge cases.
  5. Handoff with decisions, residual risks, and next steps.

Output Standard

  • Use structured headings.
  • Be specific and actionable.
  • Call out assumptions.
  • Include verification steps.
  • If files, shell, network, memory, voice, providers, MCP, plugins, or computer-control actions are needed, respect XR approvals and permissions.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A a6184e8dd0bf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Code Auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository ahmadrrrtx/xr (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 315 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.