Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ahtavarasmus/lightfriend. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ahtavarasmus/lightfriend/master/.agents/skills/lint/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahtavarasmus/lightfriendWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahtavarasmus/lightfriend/lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahtavarasmus/lightfriend/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahtavarasmus/lightfriend/lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahtavarasmus/lightfriend/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahtavarasmus/lightfriend/lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00294 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00147 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 62 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A ea20c1f4fa1e
lint is a skill published in the GitHub repository ahtavarasmus/lightfriend (78 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 294 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. 4-phase root cause investigation — NO fixes without understanding the problem first.
ha-logs
A read-only troubleshooting skill for querying Hope Agent’s local SQLite databases, which store logs, conversations, and background-job status.
ha-self-diagnosis
Self-understanding and issue reporting for Hope Agent itself. Use when the user asks how Hope Agent works internally, asks about its own source code/docs/runtime behavior, reports a bug/failure/slowness/crash, asks to diagnose logs, or asks to create/submit a GitHub issue for a bug, feature request, or improvement…
sentry-app-setup
Create and configure a Sentry internal integration so the assistant can manage issues, alerts, and releases under its own identity.
manage-skills
A maintenance workflow for checking whether project verification skills still cover the code and rules that changed during a session.
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…