Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst --skill trace-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analystWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst/trace-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst/trace-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst/trace-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst/trace-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst/trace-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00312 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00125 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
trace-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Trace one analysis
First invoke the trace skill so the machine-readable provenance record,
lightweight receipt, and shareable HTML exist. Then review the claim through
these records:
- The output states the claim.
- The receipt identifies the source, data snapshot, query, and artifacts.
- The trace records how the run unfolded.
- Logs record specific system and query events.
- The query and result provide execution evidence.
Use helpers.evals.trace.inspect_receipt on
working/trace_receipt_<analysis_id>.json to identify missing fields and
initial query risks. Then inspect the analytical details that code cannot infer
from syntax alone: population, filters, time window, timezone, exclusions,
grain, join cardinality, missingness, referential integrity, freshness,
reconciliation, and whether the claim stays within the evidence.
For a query with a join and aggregate, test the grain directly. Compare the candidate total with a defensible reference query when one exists. A query that runs successfully may still answer the wrong question.
Save the written review beside the analysis. Report the review path and the HTML trace path together. Report missing evidence as missing. A complete receipt makes an analysis inspectable. It does not make the analysis correct.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines 3b023e936f60
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 601c922b46a6
trace-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst (322 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 312 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
trace-analysis compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| trace-analysisai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst | Skill | 322 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |