Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AI-Unified-Process/marketplace --skill dotnet-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AI-Unified-Process/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-unified-process/marketplace/dotnet-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-unified-process/marketplace/dotnet-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-unified-process/marketplace/dotnet-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-unified-process/marketplace/dotnet-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-unified-process/marketplace/dotnet-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.00702 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00351 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
.NET Backend Unit & Integration Testing
Goal
Generate unit and integration tests for non-UI C# code (EF Core DbContext, handlers, domain logic) using xUnit and in-memory or SQLite EF Core test contexts.
If Tests for This Handler Already Exist
A diff of the specification change may follow the file path in the arguments. When it is there, it is the definitive list of what changed — work through it change by change. A removed line means the scenario it described was dropped: delete the tests that exist only for it instead of keeping them as passing extras.
Before writing new tests, look for an existing test class for this handler / repository (e.g.
PlaceOrderHandlerTests.cs). If one exists, update it to match the current specification and
implementation instead of creating a second test class:
- Add test methods for scenarios and business rules the spec has gained since the tests were written
- Update existing test methods whose seeded data, command/query shape, or expected results the implementation has changed
- Delete tests for scenarios the spec no longer contains
- Leave passing tests the spec still requires untouched
- Run the whole test class afterwards, not only the methods you added
Workflow
- Identify Target Service/Handler:
- Locate the target handler or EF Core repository (e.g.
PlaceOrderHandler.cs). - Check whether tests for it already exist. If they do, follow "If Tests for This Handler Already Exist" above and update them instead of adding a parallel test class.
- Locate the target handler or EF Core repository (e.g.
- Setup Test Database Context:
- Prefer SQLite in-memory or Testcontainers: Use
UseSqlite("DataSource=:memory:")(keeping connection open during test execution) orTestcontainersfor realistic relational database behavior. AvoidUseInMemoryDatabasefor EF Core tests as it does not enforce relational constraints or raw SQL behavior.
- Prefer SQLite in-memory or Testcontainers: Use
- Execute & Assert (AAA Pattern with Fresh DbContext Instances):
- Arrange: Seed test data using an initial
DbContextinstance, then dispose or save changes. - Act: Execute the handler or service method using a new, separate
DbContextinstance to prevent EF Core change tracking from masking bugs. - Assert: Verify expected outcome, returned DTOs, or database state using a third fresh
DbContextinstance.
- Arrange: Seed test data using an initial
- Verification:
- Execute
dotnet testto confirm tests pass.
- Execute
- Next Step Guidance:
- Conclude your response by guiding the user on E2E testing:
"Next step: Run
/playwright-testto generate native C# end-to-end browser tests for your use cases."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 56 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A f1e0600ddfab
dotnet-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository AI-Unified-Process/marketplace (123 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 702 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
author-test
Generate a test given sample. Parameters: C# SDK repository root; Package name: one of Azure.AI.Projects, Azure.AI.Projects.Agents or Azure.AI.Extensions.OpenAI; the sample to use as a starting point for the test.
migrate-mstest-v3-to-v4
Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing any MSTest 3.x-to-4.x upgrade or post-upgrade failure. Triggers include "MSTest v4 breaking changes"; CS0507/CS0103/CS1061/CS1615; ExecuteAsync, CallerInfo, DisplayName, or custom TestMethodAttribute; ClassCleanupBehavior; ContainsKey; ThrowsExactly or…
migrate-mstest-v1v2-to-v3
Use this skill before answering or editing whenever an MSTest v1/v2 project is being upgraded or repaired for v3. Triggers include QualityTools assembly references; MSTest.TestFramework/TestAdapter 1.x-2.x; "upgrade to MSTest v3"; comparing v1 and v2 migration paths; choosing MSTest or MSTest.Sdk; CS0411/CS1503 after…
writing-mstest-tests
ALWAYS USE when asked to fix, rewrite, update, improve, modernize, show corrected code for, or explain existing MSTest tests or MSTest-specific configuration. Use for "review" when corrected code or edits are wanted, even for one pasted assertion or passing tests with bad failure output. Covers expected/actual labels…
migrate-xunit-to-mstest
Convert .NET tests from xUnit.net v2/v3 to MSTest v4 while preserving VSTest or MTP. Use for replacing xunit packages, Fact/Theory/InlineData/MemberData, assertions, IClassFixture/ICollectionFixture, ITestOutputHelper, TestContext cancellation, traits/Owner, skips, timeouts, and xUnit parallelization. Also use when a…
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…