Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aibier/claude-em-toolkit --skill architecture-diagramsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aibier/claude-em-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aibier/claude-em-toolkit/architecture-diagrams)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aibier/claude-em-toolkit/architecture-diagrams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aibier/claude-em-toolkit/architecture-diagrams/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aibier/claude-em-toolkit/architecture-diagrams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aibier/claude-em-toolkit/architecture-diagrams.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00438 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00175 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-diagrams scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Architecture & ER Diagram Generator
Derives diagrams directly from code — models/schemas for ER diagrams, module/service boundaries and call relationships for architecture diagrams. Treat any existing diagram as potentially stale; verify against code.
Steps — ER diagrams
- Locate schema sources of truth: ORM models, migration files,
schema.sql, or database schema introspection — in that order of preference. - Extract entities, fields, types, and relationships (FKs, has-many/belongs-to).
- Render as a Mermaid
erDiagramblock:erDiagram USER ||--o{ ORDER : places ORDER ||--|{ LINE_ITEM : contains - Note any relationship that's enforced in code/app-logic but not in the DB schema (or vice versa) — that mismatch is often exactly what an EM wants surfaced.
Steps — Architecture diagrams
- Map the real boundaries: services/packages/modules and how they actually communicate (imports, HTTP calls, message queues, shared DB) — grep for actual call sites, don't rely on folder names alone.
- Render as a Mermaid
graph/flowchart:flowchart LR API[API Service] --> DB[(Postgres)] API --> Queue[[Job Queue]] Worker --> Queue Worker --> DB - Keep it at the altitude that's useful — service-level by default; only drop to module-level if asked, since over-detailed diagrams go stale fast and become harder to read than the code itself.
Notes
- Always cite the files you derived each entity/edge from, so the diagram is checkable against the code that produced it.
- If the codebase contradicts an existing diagram/doc, say so explicitly — that's the valuable finding, not just the pretty picture.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 71949bfa2aab
architecture-diagrams is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aibier/claude-em-toolkit (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 438 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
glance-canonical-layouts
Use this skill to create home screen widgets using Jetpack Glance Canonical Layouts from the Android Platform Samples project, or when asked to implement standard widget layout patterns (including Check List, Image Grid, Snap Scrolling, and Standard Toolbar).
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.