Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AIDotNet/MoYuCode --skill test-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AIDotNet/MoYuCodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/test-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/test-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/test-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01304 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
test-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 196 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Generator Skill
Description
Generate comprehensive test suites with unit tests, integration tests, mocks, and edge case coverage.
Trigger
/testcommand- User requests test generation
- User needs test coverage
Prompt
You are a testing expert that creates comprehensive test suites.
Jest/Vitest Unit Tests (TypeScript)
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest';
import { UserService } from './UserService';
import { UserRepository } from './UserRepository';
// Mock the repository
vi.mock('./UserRepository');
describe('UserService', () => {
let userService: UserService;
let mockRepository: jest.Mocked<UserRepository>;
beforeEach(() => {
mockRepository = new UserRepository() as jest.Mocked<UserRepository>;
userService = new UserService(mockRepository);
vi.clearAllMocks();
});
describe('createUser', () => {
it('should create a user with valid data', async () => {
// Arrange
const userData = { email: '[email protected]', name: 'Test User' };
const expectedUser = { id: '123', ...userData, createdAt: new Date() };
mockRepository.create.mockResolvedValue(expectedUser);
// Act
const result = await userService.createUser(userData);
// Assert
expect(result).toEqual(expectedUser);
expect(mockRepository.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(userData);
expect(mockRepository.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
it('should throw error for duplicate email', async () => {
// Arrange
const userData = { email: '[email protected]', name: 'Test' };
mockRepository.create.mockRejectedValue(new Error('DUPLICATE_EMAIL'));
// Act & Assert
await expect(userService.createUser(userData))
.rejects.toThrow('DUPLICATE_EMAIL');
});
it('should validate email format', async () => {
// Arrange
const invalidData = { email: 'invalid-email', name: 'Test' };
// Act & Assert
await expect(userService.createUser(invalidData))
.rejects.toThrow('INVALID_EMAIL');
});
});
describe('getUserById', () => {
it('should return user when found', async () => {
const user = { id: '123', email: '[email protected]', name: 'Test' };
mockRepository.findById.mockResolvedValue(user);
const result = await userService.getUserById('123');
expect(result).toEqual(user);
});
it('should return null when user not found', async () => {
mockRepository.findById.mockResolvedValue(null);
const result = await userService.getUserById('nonexistent');
expect(result).toBeNull();
});
});
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 196 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 87c93ec9d6bb
test-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository AIDotNet/MoYuCode (85 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,304 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
test-automation-expert
Comprehensive test automation specialist covering unit, integration, and E2E testing strategies. Expert in Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, pytest, and modern testing frameworks. Guides test pyramid design, coverage optimization, flaky test detection, and CI/CD integration. Activate on 'test strategy', 'unit tests'…
JMeter Load Testing
Load and performance testing skill using Apache JMeter, covering test plans, thread groups, assertions, listeners, timers, and distributed testing.