Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer/tsa-structurenpx skills add aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer --skill tsa-structuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer/tsa-structure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer/tsa-structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer/tsa-structure.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00133 | $0.00754 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00067 | $0.00377 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
tsa-structure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
tsa-structure — File shape without the file body
Tool routing
| Question | Tool |
|---|---|
| Outline / table of classes + methods | structure action=analyze |
Run a tree-sitter query (e.g., all def nodes) |
search action=query |
| Detect design patterns (singleton, factory, …) | health action=patterns |
| Classify a diff (refactor vs feature vs fix) | edit action=classify |
Procedure
File outline (most common)
structure action=analyze file_path="tree_sitter_analyzer/health_scorer.py"
# returns: {classes: [...], functions: [...], imports: [...]}
For a markdown-formatted table:
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --table full
Custom tree-sitter query
When you need something the built-in tools don't surface:
search action=query file_path="..." query_key="class"
# OR
search action=query file_path="..." query_string="(decorated_definition) @decorated"
--list-queries (CLI) shows all built-in queries available per language.
Diff classification
edit action=classify file_path="..." before_hash="abc" after_hash="def"
# returns: {classification: "refactor|feature|bugfix|test|docs|chore", confidence: 0.92}
Useful for PR descriptions and CHANGELOG categorization.
Pattern detection
health action=patterns file_path="..." patterns=["singleton", "factory", "observer"]
CLI equivalents
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --table full # outline
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --query-key class # built-in query
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --query-string "(...)" # custom query
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer <file> --code-patterns
uv run tree-sitter-analyzer --semantic-classify # edit action=classify
Anti-patterns
- DON'T read the whole file just to find "what classes are in it" — use the structure tool
- DON'T write a custom tree-sitter query when
structure action=analyzecovers it - DON'T use
edit action=classifyon huge multi-purpose commits — split them first
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 95 lines · 133 tokens per session scan A 26ad8362e016
tsa-structure is a skill published in the GitHub repository aimasteracc/tree-sitter-analyzer (48 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 133 tokens to every session and 754 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
context7-docs
Fetch up-to-date documentation and code examples for any library, framework, SDK, CLI tool, or cloud service. Use whenever the user asks about a specific library — even well-known ones like React, Next.js, Prisma, Express, Tailwind, Django, or Spring Boot — because training data may not reflect recent API changes or…
design-review
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use…
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when…
autoplan
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when…
miniapp-dev
Develops, maintains, and generates BitFun MiniApps (Zero-Dialect Runtime). Use when (1) working on miniapp framework code under src/crates/assembly/core/src/miniapp/ or src/web-ui/src/app/scenes/miniapps/; or (2) generating / creating / designing a NEW MiniApp for the user — including any request like "做一个小应用 / 生成…
agent-eval-canvas
Create a BitFun Canvas for single-case agent evaluation and trajectory diagnosis. Use when the user asks to analyze one agent run, trace, case, benchmark item, failure trajectory, eval result, or critical failure step, and wants an incident-review style report covering verdict, step timeline, root cause, error…