Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aiming-lab/metaclaw/visualization-selectionnpx skills add aiming-lab/MetaClaw --skill visualization-selectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiming-lab/MetaClawWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00190 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00095 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
visualization-selection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Visualization Selection Guide
| Goal | Chart Type |
|---|---|
| Compare categories | Bar chart (horizontal if many labels) |
| Show distribution | Histogram, box plot, violin plot |
| Show trend over time | Line chart |
| Show correlation | Scatter plot, heatmap |
| Show part-to-whole | Pie (<=5 slices), stacked bar |
Principles:
- Label axes and include units.
- Use color purposefully — not just for decoration.
- Avoid 3D charts; they distort perception.
- Start y-axis at 0 for bar charts (truncated bars mislead).
- Use a colorblind-safe palette (e.g.,
viridis,colorbrewer).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 23 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 52304cf11422
visualization-selection is a skill published in the GitHub repository aiming-lab/MetaClaw (3,494 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 190 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-llms-litgpt
Implements and trains LLMs using Lightning AI's LitGPT with 20+ pretrained architectures (Llama, Gemma, Phi, Qwen, Mistral). Use when need clean model implementations, educational understanding of architectures, or production fine-tuning with LoRA/QLoRA. Single-file implementations, no abstraction layers.
peft-fine-tuning
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for LLMs using LoRA, QLoRA, and 25+ methods. Use when fine-tuning large models (7B-70B) with limited GPU memory, when you need to train <1% of parameters with minimal accuracy loss, or for multi-adapter serving. HuggingFace's official library integrated with transformers ecosystem.
axolotl
Expert guidance for fine-tuning LLMs with Axolotl - YAML configs, 100+ models, LoRA/QLoRA, DPO/KTO/ORPO/GRPO, multimodal support.
llama-factory
Expert guidance for fine-tuning LLMs with LLaMA-Factory - WebUI no-code, 100+ models, 2/3/4/5/6/8-bit QLoRA, multimodal support.
unsloth
Expert guidance for fast fine-tuning with Unsloth - 2-5x faster training, 50-80% less memory, LoRA/QLoRA optimization.
Training
Guides fine-tuning and post-training work with explicit data, objective, hardware, and rollback assumptions.