Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aiya000/dotfiles --skill git-pullgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiya000/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-pull)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-pull/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-pull.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00708 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
git-pull scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
git-pull
Pull commits from remote after reviewing what is incoming and making sure local work is safe.
Behavior
- Run the
git-fetchskill to fetch and learn the state of the branch against its upstream - If the branch is up to date or only ahead, report that there is nothing to pull and stop
- Run
git statusto check for uncommitted changes (see Uncommitted Changes below) - Decide how to integrate (see Choosing How to Integrate below)
- Pull, then run
git statusand report what changed, including anythinggit-fetchpointed out as running code or changing how tools behave
Choosing How to Integrate
- Behind (fast-forward possible) -- run
git pull --ff-only - Diverged -- do not pull yet. Use AskUserQuestion to present these options:
- "Rebase" -- run
git pull --rebase - "Merge" -- run
git pull --no-rebase - "Cancel" -- abort without further action
- "Rebase" -- run
If the project's AGENTS.md, or the user, says which one to use, follow that instead of asking.
Uncommitted Changes
If git status shows uncommitted changes, check whether any of them are in files the incoming commits
touch (the files git-fetch reported).
- No overlap -- proceed; git carries the changes across
- Overlap -- do not pull. Use AskUserQuestion to present these options:
- "Stash, pull, then pop" --
git stash push, pull, thengit stash pop; report any conflict from the pop - "Commit first" -- cancel so the user (or the
git-commitskill) can commit the changes first - "Cancel" -- abort without further action
- "Stash, pull, then pop" --
Conflicts
If the pull stops with conflicts, do not resolve them on your own and do not abort the merge or
rebase. List the conflicted files (git status) and ask the user how to proceed.
Does Not
- Run
git reset --hard,git clean,git checkout -- <file>, or anything else that discards local changes - Run
git merge --abortorgit rebase --abortwithout explicit user request - Pull into a worktree this session was not launched in -- it changes the branch under whoever is working there
- Pull a branch other than the current one's upstream without explicit user request
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 18d ago First seen · 59 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 2acbba4a66f1
git-pull is a skill published in the GitHub repository aiya000/dotfiles (21 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 708 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
restart__pull_request
A pull-request restart workflow for replacing a messy review with a new pull request containing one clean commit and a summary of the earlier discussion.
rescue__pull_request_review
An automated workflow for handling GitHub pull-request review comments, applying requested code changes, committing them, and pushing them back.
submit__pull_request
An automated pull-request submission workflow. A pull request is a request for a code change to be reviewed and merged; this workflow writes its explanation, creates it, watches its automated checks, and fixes failed checks.
write__pull_request
A workflow for writing a pull request description, the explanation attached to a proposed code change for review. It analyses the changes and commit history.
monitor__ci_status
An automated monitor for GitHub Actions, the service that runs checks such as tests after code changes. It watches all checks after a pull request or a push to a pull-request branch and can invoke a failure-recovery process.
monitor__pull_request_conflict
An automated check for GitHub pull requests, which are proposed code changes awaiting review or merging.