Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aiya000/dotfiles --skill git-resolve-for-origin-developgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiya000/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-resolve-for-origin-develop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-resolve-for-origin-develop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-resolve-for-origin-develop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-resolve-for-origin-develop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiya000/dotfiles/git-resolve-for-origin-develop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.02926 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01170 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00585 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
git-resolve-for-origin-develop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 272 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
origin/develop への rebase とコンフリクト解消
目的
対象ブランチを最新の origin/develop へ rebase し、コンフリクトを安全に解消して、検証が通る状態までローカルで仕上げる。
呼び出し形式
/git-resolve-for-origin-develop [<Issue URL または Issue 番号>]
- 引数は省略可能
- 引数は「どのブランチを rebase するか」を決めるためだけに使う
- 引数があっても、Issue 本文の内容をコードへ実装することはしない
対象ブランチの決定
次の A → B → X → C の順にフォールバックする。 先の手段で対象が一意に決まった時点で、以降の手段は試さない。 決定後は、必ず対象ブランチと決定根拠(A/B/X/C)を宣言してから作業を始める。
A. Issue に紐づく PR の head ブランチ
引数で Issue が指定された場合に試す。
-
Issue を確認する
gh issue view <issue-url-or-number> --json number,title,url,state -
Issue に紐づく PR を取得する
gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner:String!,$repo:String!,$number:Int!){ repository(owner:$owner,name:$repo){ issue(number:$number){ timelineItems(itemTypes:[CROSS_REFERENCED_EVENT,CONNECTED_EVENT],first:100){ nodes{ __typename ... on CrossReferencedEvent{ source{ ... on PullRequest{ number headRefName state isDraft url } } } ... on ConnectedEvent{ subject{ ... on PullRequest{ number headRefName state isDraft url } } } } } } } }' -F owner=<owner> -F repo=<repo> -F number=<issue-number>取得できない場合の補助として次も使う
gh pr list --state open --search "<issue-number>" --json number,title,headRefName,url -
open な PR が 1 件に絞れたら、その
headRefNameを対象ブランチにする -
open な PR が複数ある場合は A を成立させず C へ進む
-
対象ブランチが現在のブランチと異なる場合も、A で一意に決まったなら切り替えて進める。ただし作業ツリーがクリーンでないときは切り替えず C へ進む
B. 現在のブランチ
A が成立しなかった場合に試す。
-
git branch --show-currentで現在のブランチを取得する -
現在のブランチが
develop/main/masterの場合は B を成立させず X へ進む -
detached HEAD の場合は B を成立させず C へ進む
-
現在のブランチに紐づく open PR があるか確認する
gh pr view --json number,title,headRefName,baseRefName,url -
PR があり、その head が現在のブランチなら、現在のブランチを対象にする
-
PR がない場合、そのブランチが作業ブランチだと判断できるなら現在のブランチを対象にしてよい。判断できないときは X へ進む
X. 推論
A も B も成立しなかった場合に、根拠を挙げて推論する。
- ブランチ名に Issue 番号が含まれる(例:
feature/3207-xxx、fix/issue-3207) - ブランチの独自コミットのメッセージに Issue 番号や Issue タイトルと一致する記述がある
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 272 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A ea167856cd52
git-resolve-for-origin-develop is a skill published in the GitHub repository aiya000/dotfiles (21 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,926 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.
Other skills, from other repositories
restart__pull_request
A pull-request restart workflow for replacing a messy review with a new pull request containing one clean commit and a summary of the earlier discussion.
rescue__pull_request_review
An automated workflow for handling GitHub pull-request review comments, applying requested code changes, committing them, and pushing them back.
submit__pull_request
An automated pull-request submission workflow. A pull request is a request for a code change to be reviewed and merged; this workflow writes its explanation, creates it, watches its automated checks, and fixes failed checks.
write__pull_request
A workflow for writing a pull request description, the explanation attached to a proposed code change for review. It analyses the changes and commit history.
monitor__ci_status
An automated monitor for GitHub Actions, the service that runs checks such as tests after code changes. It watches all checks after a pull request or a push to a pull-request branch and can invoke a failure-recovery process.
monitor__pull_request_conflict
An automated check for GitHub pull requests, which are proposed code changes awaiting review or merging.