Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aizaz-Noor/Agent-Startup-Skills --skill security-auditor-saasgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aizaz-Noor/Agent-Startup-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizaz-noor/agent-startup-skills/security-auditor-saas)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizaz-noor/agent-startup-skills/security-auditor-saas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizaz-noor/agent-startup-skills/security-auditor-saas/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aizaz-noor/agent-startup-skills/security-auditor-saas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aizaz-noor/agent-startup-skills/security-auditor-saas.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00751 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00300 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor-saas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- security-auditor-saas — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Auditor — Hardening Agent
Purpose
Identify and remediate security vulnerabilities before the product is deployed. Prevent data breaches, unauthorized access, and common attack vectors.
When to Use
- After code and tests are complete
- Before deployment planning
- When the user asks "is this code secure?"
Audit Checklist (OWASP Top 10 Aligned)
1. Injection (SQL, NoSQL, Command)
- All database queries use parameterized statements or ORM
- No string concatenation in queries
- User input is never passed directly to system commands
2. Broken Authentication
- Passwords are hashed with bcrypt/argon2 (never plain text, never MD5/SHA)
- Sessions expire after a reasonable timeout
- Login has rate limiting or brute-force protection
- Password reset tokens are single-use and time-limited
3. Sensitive Data Exposure
- No secrets in source code (API keys, passwords, tokens)
-
.envfiles are in.gitignore - HTTPS is enforced in production
- Sensitive data is not logged
4. Broken Access Control
- Users cannot access other users' data by changing IDs in URLs
- Admin routes are protected with role checks
- API endpoints verify the requesting user's permissions
5. Security Misconfiguration
- CORS is configured to allow only known origins
- Debug mode is disabled in production config
- Default credentials are changed
- Error messages do not expose stack traces to users
6. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
- All user-generated content is escaped/sanitized before rendering
- Content-Security-Policy headers are set
- React/Vue/Angular auto-escaping is not bypassed (no dangerouslySetInnerHTML)
7. Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
- CSRF tokens are used on state-changing forms
- SameSite cookie attribute is set
8. Insecure Dependencies
- No known vulnerable dependencies (check npm audit / pip audit)
- Dependencies are pinned to specific versions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 92 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 1a63c46ef01b
security-auditor-saas is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aizaz-Noor/Agent-Startup-Skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 751 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
github
Manages all git operations (commit, push, branch management, PR creation) in a standardized, safe, and consistent way. Automatically runs the code-review skill before any commit. Enforces Conventional Commits standard. Handles the full lifecycle: branch → review → commit → push → PR.
architecture-review
Before committing to an implementation plan, run this skill to stress-test the proposed architecture. Catches over-engineering, circular dependencies, missing failure modes, security gaps, and scalability cliffs — before any code is written. Acts as a "second eye" on the plan.
code-review
Systematic code review skill covering both requesting a review (pre-commit checklist) and receiving and responding to review feedback. Checks code quality, security, test coverage, architectural alignment, and documentation before any code is committed.
anti-sycophancy
Rejects false validation; enforces objective critique, risk exposure, and constructive code alternatives. / TR: Yapay zekanın kullanıcı fikirlerini ve hatalı kod yönlendirmelerini körü körüne onaylamasını engeller. Yapıcı itiraz eder, riskleri gösterir ve doğru alternatifi sunar.
Git PR Reviewer
Pull Request (PR) creation and code review standards with constructive feedback and merge strategies. / TR: Pull Request (PR) oluşturma ve kod inceleme (code review) süreçleri için standartlar ve yapıcı geri bildirim.
code-orchestrator
Main orchestrator managing code architecture, refactoring, clean code principles, and adversarial code reviews. / TR: Kod yazma, güvenlik, eleştirel denetim, test ve mimari süreçlerini yöneten ana orkestratör.