Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill ml-model-explanationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/ml-model-explanation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/ml-model-explanation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/ml-model-explanation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/ml-model-explanation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/ml-model-explanation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.03203 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01602 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00641 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00320 |
Grade A, and why
ML Model Explanation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 343 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ML Model Explanation
Model explainability makes machine learning decisions transparent and interpretable, enabling trust, compliance, debugging, and actionable insights from predictions.
Explanation Techniques
- Feature Importance: Global feature contribution to predictions
- SHAP Values: Game theory-based feature attribution
- LIME: Local linear approximations for individual predictions
- Partial Dependence Plots: Feature relationship with predictions
- Attention Maps: Visualization of model focus areas
- Surrogate Models: Simpler interpretable approximations
Explainability Types
- Global: Overall model behavior and patterns
- Local: Explanation for individual predictions
- Feature-Level: Which features matter most
- Model-Level: How different components interact
Python Implementation
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier, GradientBoostingClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier, plot_tree
from sklearn.inspection import partial_dependence, permutation_importance
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
print("=== 1. Feature Importance Analysis ===")
# Create dataset
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=20, n_informative=10,
n_redundant=5, random_state=42)
feature_names = [f'Feature_{i}' for i in range(20)]
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
# Train models
rf_model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
rf_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
gb_model = GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
gb_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
# Feature importance methods
print("\n=== Feature Importance Comparison ===")
# 1. Impurity-based importance (default)
impurity_importance = rf_model.feature_importances_
# 2. Permutation importance
perm_importance = permutation_importance(rf_model, X_test, y_test, n_repeats=10, random_state=42)
# Create comparison dataframe
importance_df = pd.DataFrame({
'Feature': feature_names,
'Impurity': impurity_importance,
'Permutation': perm_importance.importances_mean
}).sort_values('Impurity', ascending=False)
print("\nTop 10 Most Important Features (by Impurity):")
print(importance_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'Impurity']])
# 2. SHAP-like Feature Attribution
print("\n=== SHAP-like Feature Attribution ===")
class SimpleShapCalculator:
def __init__(self, model, X_background):
self.model = model
self.X_background = X_background
self.baseline = model.predict_proba(X_background.mean(axis=0).reshape(1, -1))[0]
def predict_difference(self, X_sample):
"""Get prediction difference from baseline"""
pred = self.model.predict_proba(X_sample)[0]
return pred - self.baseline
def calculate_shap_values(self, X_instance, n_iterations=100):
"""Approximate SHAP values"""
shap_values = np.zeros(X_instance.shape[1])
n_features = X_instance.shape[1]
for i in range(n_iterations):
# Random feature subset
subset_mask = np.random.random(n_features) > 0.5
# With and without feature
X_with = X_instance.copy()
X_without = X_instance.copy()
X_without[0, ~subset_mask] = self.X_background[0, ~subset_mask]
# Marginal contribution
contribution = (self.predict_difference(X_with)[1] -
self.predict_difference(X_without)[1])
shap_values[~subset_mask] += contribution / n_iterations
return shap_values
shap_calc = SimpleShapCalculator(rf_model, X_train)
# Calculate SHAP values for a sample
sample_idx = 0
shap_vals = shap_calc.calculate_shap_values(X_test[sample_idx:sample_idx+1], n_iterations=50)
print(f"\nSHAP Values for Sample {sample_idx}:")
shap_df = pd.DataFrame({
'Feature': feature_names,
'SHAP_Value': shap_vals
}).sort_values('SHAP_Value', key=abs, ascending=False)
print(shap_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'SHAP_Value']])
# 3. Partial Dependence Analysis
print("\n=== 3. Partial Dependence Analysis ===")
# Calculate partial dependence for top features
top_features = importance_df['Feature'].head(3).values
top_feature_indices = [feature_names.index(f) for f in top_features]
pd_data = {}
for feature_idx in top_feature_indices:
pd_result = partial_dependence(rf_model, X_test, [feature_idx])
pd_data[feature_names[feature_idx]] = pd_result
print(f"Partial dependence calculated for features: {list(pd_data.keys())}")
# 4. LIME - Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations
print("\n=== 4. LIME (Local Surrogate Model) ===")
class SimpleLIME:
def __init__(self, model, X_train):
self.model = model
self.X_train = X_train
self.scaler = StandardScaler()
self.scaler.fit(X_train)
def explain_instance(self, instance, n_samples=1000, n_features=10):
"""Explain prediction using local linear model"""
# Generate perturbed samples
scaled_instance = self.scaler.transform(instance.reshape(1, -1))
perturbations = np.random.normal(scaled_instance, 0.3, (n_samples, instance.shape[0]))
# Get predictions
predictions = self.model.predict_proba(perturbations)[:, 1]
# Train local linear model
distances = np.sum((perturbations - scaled_instance) ** 2, axis=1)
weights = np.exp(-distances)
# Linear regression weights
local_model = LogisticRegression()
local_model.fit(perturbations, predictions, sample_weight=weights)
# Get feature importance
feature_weights = np.abs(local_model.coef_[0])
top_indices = np.argsort(feature_weights)[-n_features:]
return {
'features': [feature_names[i] for i in top_indices],
'weights': feature_weights[top_indices],
'prediction': self.model.predict(instance.reshape(1, -1))[0]
}
lime = SimpleLIME(rf_model, X_train)
lime_explanation = lime.explain_instance(X_test[0])
print(f"\nLIME Explanation for Sample 0:")
for feat, weight in zip(lime_explanation['features'], lime_explanation['weights']):
print(f" {feat}: {weight:.4f}")
# 5. Decision Tree Visualization
print("\n=== 5. Decision Tree Interpretation ===")
# Train small tree for visualization
small_tree = DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=3, random_state=42)
small_tree.fit(X_train, y_train)
print(f"Decision Tree (depth=3) trained")
print(f"Tree accuracy: {small_tree.score(X_test, y_test):.4f}")
# 6. Model-agnostic global explanations
print("\n=== 6. Global Model Behavior ===")
class GlobalExplainer:
def __init__(self, model):
self.model = model
def get_prediction_distribution(self, X):
"""Analyze prediction distribution"""
predictions = self.model.predict_proba(X)
return {
'class_0_mean': predictions[:, 0].mean(),
'class_1_mean': predictions[:, 1].mean(),
'class_1_std': predictions[:, 1].std()
}
def feature_sensitivity(self, X, feature_idx, n_perturbations=10):
"""Measure sensitivity to feature changes"""
original_pred = self.model.predict_proba(X)[:, 1].mean()
sensitivities = []
for perturbation_level in np.linspace(0.1, 1.0, n_perturbations):
X_perturbed = X.copy()
X_perturbed[:, feature_idx] = np.random.normal(
X[:, feature_idx].mean(),
X[:, feature_idx].std() * perturbation_level,
len(X)
)
perturbed_pred = self.model.predict_proba(X_perturbed)[:, 1].mean()
sensitivities.append(abs(perturbed_pred - original_pred))
return np.array(sensitivities)
explainer = GlobalExplainer(rf_model)
pred_dist = explainer.get_prediction_distribution(X_test)
print(f"\nPrediction Distribution:")
print(f" Class 0 mean probability: {pred_dist['class_0_mean']:.4f}")
print(f" Class 1 mean probability: {pred_dist['class_1_mean']:.4f}")
# 7. Visualization
print("\n=== 7. Explanability Visualizations ===")
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 3, figsize=(16, 10))
# 1. Feature Importance Comparison
top_features_plot = importance_df.head(10)
axes[0, 0].barh(top_features_plot['Feature'], top_features_plot['Impurity'], color='steelblue')
axes[0, 0].set_xlabel('Importance Score')
axes[0, 0].set_title('Feature Importance (Random Forest)')
axes[0, 0].invert_yaxis()
# 2. Permutation vs Impurity Importance
axes[0, 1].scatter(importance_df['Impurity'], importance_df['Permutation'], alpha=0.6)
axes[0, 1].set_xlabel('Impurity Importance')
axes[0, 1].set_ylabel('Permutation Importance')
axes[0, 1].set_title('Feature Importance Methods Comparison')
axes[0, 1].grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# 3. SHAP Values
shap_sorted = shap_df.head(10).sort_values('SHAP_Value')
colors = ['red' if x < 0 else 'green' for x in shap_sorted['SHAP_Value']]
axes[0, 2].barh(shap_sorted['Feature'], shap_sorted['SHAP_Value'], color=colors)
axes[0, 2].set_xlabel('SHAP Value')
axes[0, 2].set_title('SHAP Values for Sample 0')
axes[0, 2].axvline(x=0, color='black', linestyle='--', linewidth=0.8)
# 4. Partial Dependence
feature_0_idx = top_feature_indices[0]
feature_0_values = np.linspace(X_test[:, feature_0_idx].min(), X_test[:, feature_0_idx].max(), 50)
predictions_pd = []
for val in feature_0_values:
X_temp = X_test.copy()
X_temp[:, feature_0_idx] = val
pred = rf_model.predict_proba(X_temp)[:, 1].mean()
predictions_pd.append(pred)
axes[1, 0].plot(feature_0_values, predictions_pd, linewidth=2, color='purple')
axes[1, 0].set_xlabel(feature_names[feature_0_idx])
axes[1, 0].set_ylabel('Average Prediction (Class 1)')
axes[1, 0].set_title('Partial Dependence Plot')
axes[1, 0].grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# 5. Model Prediction Distribution
pred_proba = rf_model.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1]
axes[1, 1].hist(pred_proba, bins=30, color='coral', edgecolor='black', alpha=0.7)
axes[1, 1].set_xlabel('Predicted Probability (Class 1)')
axes[1, 1].set_ylabel('Frequency')
axes[1, 1].set_title('Prediction Distribution')
axes[1, 1].grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# 6. Feature Sensitivity Analysis
sensitivities = []
for feat_idx in range(min(5, X_test.shape[1])):
sensitivity = explainer.feature_sensitivity(X_test, feat_idx, n_perturbations=5)
sensitivities.append(sensitivity.mean())
axes[1, 2].bar(range(min(5, X_test.shape[1])), sensitivities, color='lightgreen', edgecolor='black')
axes[1, 2].set_xticks(range(min(5, X_test.shape[1])))
axes[1, 2].set_xticklabels([f'F{i}' for i in range(min(5, X_test.shape[1]))])
axes[1, 2].set_ylabel('Average Sensitivity')
axes[1, 2].set_title('Feature Sensitivity to Perturbations')
axes[1, 2].grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('model_explainability.png', dpi=100, bbox_inches='tight')
print("\nVisualization saved as 'model_explainability.png'")
# 8. Summary
print("\n=== Explainability Summary ===")
print(f"Total Features Analyzed: {len(feature_names)}")
print(f"Most Important Feature: {importance_df.iloc[0]['Feature']}")
print(f"Importance Score: {importance_df.iloc[0]['Impurity']:.4f}")
print(f"Model Accuracy: {rf_model.score(X_test, y_test):.4f}")
print(f"Average Prediction Confidence: {pred_proba.mean():.4f}")
print("\nML model explanation setup completed!")
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 343 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A ceadfaf8c342
ML Model Explanation is a skill published in the GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts (338 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 3,203 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-rag-engine-management
Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.