Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill model-hyperparameter-tuninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/model-hyperparameter-tuning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/model-hyperparameter-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/model-hyperparameter-tuning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/model-hyperparameter-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/model-hyperparameter-tuning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.02642 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01321 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00528 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00264 |
Grade A, and why
Model Hyperparameter Tuning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 315 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Model Hyperparameter Tuning
Overview
Hyperparameter tuning is the process of systematically searching for the best combination of model configuration parameters to maximize performance on validation data.
When to Use
- When optimizing model performance beyond baseline configurations
- When comparing different parameter combinations systematically
- When fine-tuning complex models with many hyperparameters
- When seeking the best trade-off between bias, variance, and training time
- When improving model generalization on validation and test data
- When exploring parameter spaces for neural networks, tree models, or ensemble methods
Tuning Methods
- Grid Search: Exhaustive search over parameter grid
- Random Search: Random sampling from parameter space
- Bayesian Optimization: Probabilistic model-based search
- Hyperband: Multi-fidelity optimization
- Evolutionary Algorithms: Genetic algorithm based search
- Population-based Training: Distributed parameter optimization
Hyperparameters by Model Type
- Tree Models: max_depth, min_samples_split, learning_rate
- Neural Networks: learning_rate, batch_size, num_layers, dropout
- SVM: C, kernel, gamma
- Ensemble: n_estimators, max_features, min_samples_leaf
Python Implementation
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split, cross_val_score
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier, GradientBoostingClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV, RandomizedSearchCV
import optuna
from optuna.samplers import TPESampler
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torch.optim import Adam
import time
# Create dataset
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=2000, n_features=50, n_informative=30,
n_redundant=10, random_state=42)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)
print("Dataset shapes:", X_train_scaled.shape, X_test_scaled.shape)
# 1. Grid Search
print("\n=== 1. Grid Search ===")
start = time.time()
param_grid = {
'n_estimators': [50, 100, 200],
'max_depth': [5, 10, 15],
'min_samples_split': [2, 5, 10],
'min_samples_leaf': [1, 2, 4]
}
grid_search = GridSearchCV(
RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42),
param_grid,
cv=5,
scoring='accuracy',
n_jobs=-1,
verbose=0
)
grid_search.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
grid_time = time.time() - start
print(f"Best parameters: {grid_search.best_params_}")
print(f"Best CV score: {grid_search.best_score_:.4f}")
print(f"Test score: {grid_search.score(X_test_scaled, y_test):.4f}")
print(f"Time taken: {grid_time:.2f}s")
# 2. Random Search
print("\n=== 2. Random Search ===")
start = time.time()
param_dist = {
'n_estimators': np.arange(50, 300, 10),
'max_depth': np.arange(5, 30, 1),
'min_samples_split': np.arange(2, 20, 1),
'min_samples_leaf': np.arange(1, 10, 1),
'max_features': ['sqrt', 'log2']
}
random_search = RandomizedSearchCV(
RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42),
param_dist,
n_iter=20,
cv=5,
scoring='accuracy',
n_jobs=-1,
random_state=42,
verbose=0
)
random_search.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
random_time = time.time() - start
print(f"Best parameters: {random_search.best_params_}")
print(f"Best CV score: {random_search.best_score_:.4f}")
print(f"Test score: {random_search.score(X_test_scaled, y_test):.4f}")
print(f"Time taken: {random_time:.2f}s")
# 3. Bayesian Optimization with Optuna
print("\n=== 3. Bayesian Optimization (Optuna) ===")
def objective(trial):
params = {
'n_estimators': trial.suggest_int('n_estimators', 50, 300),
'max_depth': trial.suggest_int('max_depth', 5, 30),
'min_samples_split': trial.suggest_int('min_samples_split', 2, 20),
'min_samples_leaf': trial.suggest_int('min_samples_leaf', 1, 10),
'max_features': trial.suggest_categorical('max_features', ['sqrt', 'log2'])
}
model = RandomForestClassifier(**params, random_state=42)
scores = cross_val_score(model, X_train_scaled, y_train, cv=5, scoring='accuracy')
return scores.mean()
start = time.time()
sampler = TPESampler(seed=42)
study = optuna.create_study(sampler=sampler, direction='maximize')
study.optimize(objective, n_trials=20, show_progress_bar=False)
optuna_time = time.time() - start
best_trial = study.best_trial
print(f"Best parameters: {best_trial.params}")
print(f"Best CV score: {best_trial.value:.4f}")
# Train final model with best params
best_model = RandomForestClassifier(**best_trial.params, random_state=42)
best_model.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
print(f"Test score: {best_model.score(X_test_scaled, y_test):.4f}")
print(f"Time taken: {optuna_time:.2f}s")
# 4. Gradient Boosting hyperparameter tuning
print("\n=== 4. Gradient Boosting Tuning ===")
gb_param_grid = {
'learning_rate': [0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2],
'n_estimators': [100, 200, 300],
'max_depth': [3, 5, 7, 9],
'min_samples_split': [2, 5, 10],
'subsample': [0.8, 0.9, 1.0]
}
gb_search = GridSearchCV(
GradientBoostingClassifier(random_state=42),
gb_param_grid,
cv=5,
scoring='accuracy',
n_jobs=-1,
verbose=0
)
gb_search.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
print(f"Best parameters: {gb_search.best_params_}")
print(f"Best CV score: {gb_search.best_score_:.4f}")
print(f"Test score: {gb_search.score(X_test_scaled, y_test):.4f}")
# 5. Learning rate tuning for neural networks
print("\n=== 5. Learning Rate Tuning for Neural Networks ===")
class SimpleNN(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(50, 128)
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(128, 64)
self.fc3 = nn.Linear(64, 1)
self.relu = nn.ReLU()
self.dropout = nn.Dropout(0.3)
def forward(self, x):
x = self.relu(self.fc1(x))
x = self.dropout(x)
x = self.relu(self.fc2(x))
x = self.dropout(x)
x = torch.sigmoid(self.fc3(x))
return x
learning_rates = [0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1]
lr_results = {}
device = torch.device('cpu')
for lr in learning_rates:
model = SimpleNN().to(device)
optimizer = Adam(model.parameters(), lr=lr)
criterion = nn.BCELoss()
X_train_tensor = torch.FloatTensor(X_train_scaled)
y_train_tensor = torch.FloatTensor(y_train).unsqueeze(1)
best_loss = float('inf')
patience = 10
patience_counter = 0
for epoch in range(100):
output = model(X_train_tensor)
loss = criterion(output, y_train_tensor)
optimizer.zero_grad()
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
if loss.item() < best_loss:
best_loss = loss.item()
patience_counter = 0
else:
patience_counter += 1
if patience_counter >= patience:
break
lr_results[lr] = best_loss
print(f"Learning Rate {lr}: Best Loss = {best_loss:.6f}")
# 6. Comparison visualization
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(14, 10))
# Search method comparison
methods = ['Grid Search', 'Random Search', 'Bayesian Opt']
times = [grid_time, random_time, optuna_time]
scores = [grid_search.best_score_, random_search.best_score_, study.best_value]
x = np.arange(len(methods))
axes[0, 0].bar(x, times, color='steelblue', alpha=0.7)
axes[0, 0].set_ylabel('Time (seconds)')
axes[0, 0].set_title('Tuning Method Comparison - Time')
axes[0, 0].set_xticks(x)
axes[0, 0].set_xticklabels(methods)
axes[0, 1].bar(x, scores, color='coral', alpha=0.7)
axes[0, 1].set_ylabel('CV Accuracy')
axes[0, 1].set_title('Tuning Method Comparison - Accuracy')
axes[0, 1].set_xticks(x)
axes[0, 1].set_xticklabels(methods)
axes[0, 1].set_ylim([0.8, 1.0])
# Hyperparameter importance from Optuna
importance_dict = {}
for param_name in study.best_trial.params.keys():
trial_values = []
for trial in study.trials:
if param_name in trial.params:
trial_values.append(trial.value)
if trial_values:
importance_dict[param_name] = np.std(trial_values)
axes[1, 0].barh(list(importance_dict.keys()), list(importance_dict.values()),
color='lightgreen', edgecolor='black')
axes[1, 0].set_xlabel('Importance (Std Dev)')
axes[1, 0].set_title('Hyperparameter Importance')
# Learning rate tuning for NN
axes[1, 1].plot(list(lr_results.keys()), list(lr_results.values()), marker='o',
linewidth=2, markersize=8, color='purple')
axes[1, 1].set_xlabel('Learning Rate')
axes[1, 1].set_ylabel('Best Training Loss')
axes[1, 1].set_title('Learning Rate Impact on Neural Network')
axes[1, 1].set_xscale('log')
axes[1, 1].grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('hyperparameter_tuning.png', dpi=100, bbox_inches='tight')
print("\nVisualization saved as 'hyperparameter_tuning.png'")
print("\nHyperparameter tuning completed!")
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 315 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 468a786e401a
Model Hyperparameter Tuning is a skill published in the GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts (338 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,642 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-rag-engine-management
Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.