Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill penetration-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/penetration-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/penetration-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/penetration-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/penetration-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/penetration-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket warn
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00500 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
penetration-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Penetration Testing
Table of Contents
Overview
Systematic security testing to identify, exploit, and document vulnerabilities in applications, networks, and infrastructure through simulated attacks.
When to Use
- Pre-production security validation
- Annual security assessments
- Compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, ISO 27001)
- Post-incident security review
- Third-party security audits
- Red team exercises
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
# pentest_framework.py
import requests
import socket
import subprocess
import json
from typing import List, Dict
from dataclasses import dataclass, asdict
from datetime import datetime
@dataclass
class Finding:
severity: str
category: str
target: str
vulnerability: str
evidence: str
remediation: str
cvss_score: float
class PenetrationTester:
def __init__(self, target: str):
self.target = target
self.findings: List[Finding] = []
def test_sql_injection(self, url: str) -> None:
// ... (see reference guides for full implementation)
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| Automated Penetration Testing Framework | Automated Penetration Testing Framework |
| Burp Suite Automation Script | Burp Suite Automation Script |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Get written authorization
- Define clear scope
- Use controlled environments
- Document all findings
- Follow responsible disclosure
- Provide remediation guidance
- Verify fixes after patching
- Maintain chain of custody
❌ DON'T
- Test production without approval
- Cause service disruption
- Exfiltrate sensitive data
- Share findings publicly
- Exceed authorized scope
- Use destructive payloads
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 23e90bcd172d
penetration-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts (376 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 500 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
penetration-testing compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| penetration-testingaj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts | Skill | 376 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |