Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ajhcs/healthcare-agents --skill healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ajhcs/healthcare-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00171 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00068 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Survey evidence gap review
Build a standard-to-evidence gap register with accountable owners and verification criteria.
Read the workflow contract when this task applies. Use its evidence fields and decision checks; adapt the artifact to the user.
Work from approved aggregate, synthetic or otherwise authorized evidence. Keep sources, effective dates, missing facts and conflicts visible. Preserve the named human owner. External submissions, messages and production changes require scoped authorization. Provide administrative support; do not make final clinical, legal, coding, billing, audit or compliance decisions. Report the artifact delivered and remaining evidence or action; calculation alone does not complete the operational workflow.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 17 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 84b992abf7e4
healthcare-survey-readiness-gap-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ajhcs/healthcare-agents (52 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 171 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
biomedical-engineer
Think and work like an expert Biomedical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Biomedical Engineer judgment. Reasons from ISO 14971 risk management, ISO 10993 biocompatibility matrices, ASTM F/ISO 14242 mechanical and wear testing, and FDA 510(k) substantial equivalence; treats stress shielding, UHMWPE osteolysis, F2129…
ecom-compliance
Check product compliance, HS codes, IP risks, and platform requirements. Use for category approval, FDA/FCC/CE documentation, IP infringement screening, or dangerous goods classification.
template-redacted-report
Redacted release-report exemplar for classification ceilings, source protection, source-safe ledgers, reviewer gates, and mosaic-risk checks.
aviation-inspector
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aviation Inspector — determining whether an air carrier's fleet is in compliance with an Airworthiness Directive across a maintenance-records sample, deciding where the FAA's compliance-and-enforcement ladder places a finding (compliance action vs. Letter of Correction vs.…
administrative-law-judge
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Administrative Law Judge, Adjudicator, or Hearing Officer — applying a mandatory sequential/structured evaluation framework in required order, weighing conflicting medical or vocational opinion evidence using specific regulatory factors, writing findings that explicitly address…
agricultural-inspector
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Agricultural Inspector — grading a lot of produce against a USDA grade standard's defect tolerances, evaluating agricultural water test results against FSMA microbial thresholds, checking a pesticide residue result against the commodity-specific EPA tolerance, deciding whether…