What the reviewer found
An AI red-teaming skill about indirect prompt injection: the P1 hit is an academic citation (Perez & Ribeiro's paper title), and the P2/AR3 hits are labeled example payloads ('Technique 3: HTML comment injection') demonstrating the attack for training purposes. Dual-use security research material describing a technique, not a live injection.
dual-use— a security tool that can be misusedexample-or-fixture— an example or test fixture
What was read
The file as it ships in akashrpatil/awesome-offensive-security-skills:
skills/ai-red-teaming/llm-attacks/llm-indirect-prompt-injection/SKILL.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 3things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 3 as false.
P1Instruction-override phrasing — false positiveP2Hidden instructions — false positiveAR3Nullifies safety policies — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.