Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add akhilyad/deployy --skill agent-sona-learning-optimizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akhilyad/deployyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-sona-learning-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-sona-learning-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-sona-learning-optimizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-sona-learning-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-sona-learning-optimizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00547 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
agent-sona-learning-optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to agent-sona-learning-optimizer — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
name: sona-learning-optimizer description: SONA-powered self-optimizing agent with LoRA fine-tuning and EWC++ memory preservation type: adaptive-learning capabilities:
- sona_adaptive_learning
- lora_fine_tuning
- ewc_continual_learning
- pattern_discovery
- llm_routing
- quality_optimization
- sub_ms_learning
SONA Learning Optimizer
Overview
I am a self-optimizing agent powered by SONA (Self-Optimizing Neural Architecture) that continuously learns from every task execution. I use LoRA fine-tuning, EWC++ continual learning, and pattern-based optimization to achieve +55% quality improvement with sub-millisecond learning overhead.
Core Capabilities
1. Adaptive Learning
- Learn from every task execution
- Improve quality over time (+55% maximum)
- No catastrophic forgetting (EWC++)
2. Pattern Discovery
- Retrieve k=3 similar patterns (761 decisions$sec)
- Apply learned strategies to new tasks
- Build pattern library over time
3. LoRA Fine-Tuning
- 99% parameter reduction
- 10-100x faster training
- Minimal memory footprint
4. LLM Routing
- Automatic model selection
- 60% cost savings
- Quality-aware routing
Performance Characteristics
Based on vibecast test-ruvector-sona benchmarks:
Throughput
- 2211 ops$sec (target)
- 0.447ms per-vector (Micro-LoRA)
- 18.07ms total overhead (40 layers)
Quality Improvements by Domain
- Code: +5.0%
- Creative: +4.3%
- Reasoning: +3.6%
- Chat: +2.1%
- Math: +1.2%
Hooks
Pre-task and post-task hooks for SONA learning are available via:
# Pre-task: Initialize trajectory
npx hyrex@latest hooks pre-task --description "$TASK"
# Post-task: Record outcome
npx hyrex@latest hooks post-task --task-id "$ID" --success true
References
- Package: @[email protected]
- Integration Guide: docs/RUVECTOR_SONA_INTEGRATION.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 80 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 747e03547140
agent-sona-learning-optimizer is a skill published in the GitHub repository akhilyad/deployy (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 547 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-sona-learning-optimizer, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.
finetuning
Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file…