Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop --skill build-a-battlecardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/build-a-battlecard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/build-a-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/build-a-battlecard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/build-a-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/build-a-battlecard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00660 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
build-a-battlecard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Build A Battlecard
NOT generic comparison sheet. Per-prospect card anchored in what THAT prospect cares about.
When to use
- User: "they're evaluating us against {competitor}" / "build me battlecard for Acme deal vs {competitor}" / "how do I beat {competitor} for this one".
- Called inline by
write-my-outreachorcheck-my-sales subject=discovery-callwhen competitor named in transcript.
Connections I need
I run external work through Composio. Before this skill runs I check that the categories below are linked. Missing → I name the category, ask you to connect it from the Integrations tab, stop.
- Scrape - read the competitor's marketing page, pricing, and recent reviews. Required.
- Search / research - pull recent reviews, forum threads, and known weaknesses. Required.
- CRM - read the prospect's deal context to anchor the card. Optional.
If none of the required categories are connected I stop and ask you to connect Firecrawl first since the card depends on a fresh competitor read.
Information I need
I read your sales context first. For every required field that's missing I ask ONE plain-language question (best modality: connected app > file drop > URL > paste) and wait.
- Your sales playbook - Required. Why I need it: I lift differentiators, anchor accounts, and proof points from it. If missing I ask: "I don't have your playbook yet - want me to draft it now?"
- Prospect name and competitor name - Required. Why I need it: card is anchored to one specific deal versus one specific competitor, not a generic sheet. If missing I ask: "Which prospect deal is this for, and which competitor are they comparing us to?"
- Your top differentiator and biggest weakness vs this competitor - Required. Why I need it: card is honest only if I know how you actually win and lose. If missing I ask: "What's your honest top differentiator vs this competitor, and your biggest weakness?"
- Anchor customer wins matching the prospect - Optional. Why I need it: proof points land harder when they match the prospect's profile. If you don't have it I keep going with TBD.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 64 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A da3fcadde28a
build-a-battlecard is a skill published in the GitHub repository akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,321 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
fs-electric-studio
OpenDesign as an enterprise design platform: a buyer-forwardable proposal for a design-org's economic buyer — pain, value, ROI, rollout. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for economic buyer, design VP, procurement.
huashu-bento-insight
OpenDesign vs closed cloud design tools: a side-by-side displacement case on control, cost (BYOK), and lock-in. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for evaluation committee.
html-ppt-product-launch
OpenDesign Teams: a launch-and-adoption proposal for a mid-market design team weighing a switch from closed cloud tools. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for design team lead, IT.
geo-proposal
Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo"…
afrexai-lead-hunter
Enterprise-grade B2B lead generation, enrichment, scoring, and outreach sequencing for AI agents. Find ideal prospects, enrich with verified data, score against your ICP, and generate personalized outreach — all autonomously.
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…