score-an-inbound

score-an-inbound is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop. It costs 76 tokens per session (1,286 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An approval review that scores an incoming request against your saved criteria and checks public information about the person or organisation. It returns a recommendation to approve, decline, or request more information.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess advisor candidates, partnership requests, press opportunities, or other inbound proposals that require a decision.
Why use it?
It replaces gut-feel decisions with a consistent review process and evidence. It can expose warning signs before you accept a proposal or commitment.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it to assess advisor candidates, partnership requests, press opportunities, or other inbound proposals that require a decision.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/score-an-inbound
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop --skill score-an-inbound
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for score-an-inbound

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/score-an-inbound/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/score-an-inbound)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/score-an-inbound"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/score-an-inbound/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for score-an-inbound

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/score-an-inbound"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/score-an-inbound.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 76 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,286 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00076 $0.01286
Opus 5 $0.00038 $0.00643
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00257
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00129

Measured 7d ago against content hash 085ea43dd380, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

score-an-inbound scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

store/agents/operations/.agents/skills/score-an-inbound/SKILL.md · 92 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Score An Inbound

Generic approval-rubric runner for any inbound needing founder decision. Vendor-specific supplier triage → vet-a-vendor skill (procurement criteria, different folder).

When to use

  • "review this vendor application against our criteria" (supplier-specific → vet-a-vendor).
  • "score these advisor candidates".
  • "is this partnership a fit".
  • "should I accept this press request".
  • "run the approval flow on this".

Connections I need

I run external work through Composio. Before this skill runs I check the categories below are linked. Missing → I name the category, ask you to connect it from the Integrations tab, stop.

  • Web research (Exa, Perplexity, Firecrawl) - Required. Pulls public signals on the submitter to verify claims and surface red flags.
  • Inbox (Gmail, Outlook) - Optional. Lets me check prior correspondence with the submitter so the recommendation reflects history.

If no web research provider is connected I stop and ask you to connect a research provider first.

Information I need

I read your operations context first. For every required field that's missing I ask ONE plain-language question (best modality: connected app > file drop > URL > paste) and wait.

  • The submission itself - Required. Why I need it: I score what's in front of me. If missing I ask: "Drop the submission - pitch, application, request - or paste the email thread."
  • Approval rubric - Required. Why I need it: ad-hoc scoring isn't reproducible. If missing I ask: "What criteria should I use? Paste them, or say 'default' and I'll save a starter rubric for this kind of inbound that you can edit later."
  • Active priorities - Required. Why I need it: the fit-to-priorities score keys off these. If missing I ask: "What are the 2 to 3 things the company is pushing on this quarter?"
  • Hard nos - Optional. Why I need it: lets me decline anything that violates them on sight. If you don't have it I keep going with TBD using workspace defaults.

Read the full file on GitHub · 92 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 92 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 085ea43dd380

Subscribe to this mod's changes

score-an-inbound is a skill published in the GitHub repository akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,286 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.