research-codebase

A methodical research process for tracing how a codebase works and writing the findings into a reusable project note.

In plain words
What is it for?
Investigating implementation details, mapping code paths, answering debugging questions, and documenting results in the project's .ai/research directory.
Why use it?
It gives engineers evidence about architecture, behavior, dependencies, and data flow without turning the investigation into a code change proposal.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/akolotov/harness/research-codebase
Any agent
npx skills add akolotov/harness --skill research-codebase
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akolotov/harness

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 135 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,622 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00135 $0.02622
Opus 5 $0.00068 $0.01311
Sonnet 5 $0.00027 $0.00524
Haiku 4.5 $0.00014 $0.00262

Measured 2d ago against content hash 9c7ac9189219, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

research-codebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/research-metadata.sh), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

dev/skills/research-codebase/SKILL.md · 209 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Research Codebase

Investigate this project methodically, then leave behind a project-local research note that another engineer or AI agent can reuse.

This skill operates as a documentarian: it describes what exists, it does not recommend changes. The same constraint flows down to every sub-agent through the Sub-Agent Invocation Contract defined below.

Path Conventions

Paths in this document use <SKILL_DIR> to mean this skill's installation directory — for example .claude/skills/research-codebase in Claude Code, or .codex/skills/research-codebase in Codex CLI. Whenever you see <SKILL_DIR> in a Bash invocation or a Read directive (including directives this skill emits to sub-agents), substitute the actual installation path resolved from the harness. Markdown links to sibling files such as references/roles-overview.md are already relative to this file and need no substitution.

Initial Response

When invoked without a concrete research question, reply with:

I'm ready to research this codebase. Share the question or area you want investigated, and I'll trace the relevant code paths, summarize the findings, and capture the result in a project-local research note.

Then wait for the user's question.

Workflow

  1. Read any files the user names before decomposing the task. Read them fully (no limit/offset).
  2. Restate the question in precise technical terms and note the architectural implications likely to matter.
  3. Break the work into composable research areas. Decide which directories, files, interfaces, flows, or patterns must be investigated and which role (Locator / Analyzer / PatternFinder / WebResearcher) handles each one.
  4. Maintain a task list so every research area is tracked through synthesis.
  5. Delegate to sub-agents in parallel, one task per role pass. Construct each prompt by following the Sub-Agent Invocation Contract below.
  6. Start with Locator passes, follow with Analyzer passes on the most promising paths, add PatternFinder when comparable examples help, and use WebResearcher only when outside context is genuinely needed.
  7. Wait for all sub-agents to complete before synthesizing.
  8. Derive a short slug of 2–4 meaningful words for the research note.
  9. Run the metadata script (see "Metadata Script" below) to gather timestamps, target/workspace paths, git context, and the final note path.
  10. Write the research note to the path returned by the script.
  11. Present a concise answer with the most relevant file references, then ask whether the user wants follow-up research or clarification.

Read the full file on GitHub · 209 lines

Files

What ships with it

8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 209 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A 9c7ac9189219

Subscribe to this mod's changes

research-codebase is a skill published in the GitHub repository akolotov/harness (2 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 2,622 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens