Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add akshaykanni22/medbill-scanner --skill pii-redactiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akshaykanni22/medbill-scannerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akshaykanni22/medbill-scanner/pii-redaction)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akshaykanni22/medbill-scanner/pii-redaction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akshaykanni22/medbill-scanner/pii-redaction/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akshaykanni22/medbill-scanner/pii-redaction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akshaykanni22/medbill-scanner/pii-redaction.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02941 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00588 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
pii-redaction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 327 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SKILL: PII Redaction
What This Skill Does
Teaches Claude Code how to write a production-safe PII redaction service for any project handling sensitive personal data — medical bills, insurance forms, financial documents, HR records, etc.
When To Use This Skill
Invoke this skill when a project needs to strip personally identifiable information from text before that text is sent to any external API, stored in a database, or logged anywhere.
Trigger phrases:
- "add PII redaction"
- "strip patient data before the API call"
- "redact sensitive information"
- "implement PHI removal"
Core Principles (read before writing any code)
1. Redact early, redact once PII redaction must happen as the FIRST step in any pipeline that handles user-submitted text. Never pass raw text to downstream services and rely on them to handle it safely.
2. Regex over ML models for this task Do not use spaCy, Presidio, or any NLP model for basic PII redaction unless the project explicitly requires entity-level classification. Reasons:
- Regex is auditable — you can read exactly what it catches
- ML models have false negatives that are invisible and unpredictable
- Regex has zero cold start time, no model download, no GPU needed
- For structured PII (SSN, phone, email, dates) regex is more reliable than NLP anyway
3. Replace don't delete Always replace PII with a labeled placeholder like [SSN], [NAME], [DATE_OF_BIRTH]. Deleting makes the redacted text lose structure and confuses downstream LLM reasoning. Labeled placeholders let the LLM understand what was there without seeing the actual value.
4. Log redaction counts, never redacted values Log how many items were redacted per category for debugging. Never log the original PII values even in debug mode.
5. Validate redaction before sending to any API After redacting, run a second-pass check to catch any PII that slipped through. Fail loudly if the second pass finds anything.
Implementation
Patterns to cover (in order of priority)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 327 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 006f1ceb5e99
pii-redaction is a skill published in the GitHub repository akshaykanni22/medbill-scanner (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,941 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…