Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/albiol2004/trio-agent-loop/trio-initnpx skills add albiol2004/trio-agent-loop --skill trio-initgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/albiol2004/trio-agent-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/albiol2004/trio-agent-loop/trio-init)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/albiol2004/trio-agent-loop/trio-init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/albiol2004/trio-agent-loop/trio-init.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00807 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
trio-init scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Set up the trio-loop mailbox in the current project.
Mailbox directory: default loop/. If $ARGUMENTS starts with dir=<path> (e.g. /trio-init dir=loop-authz add rate limiting…), use that directory instead — every loop/ reference below then means that directory. One mailbox per loop is a hard rule: two loops (or two sessions) sharing a mailbox corrupt each other's state.
- If the mailbox's
STATE.mdalready exists, show its current status and LOG.md tail, then ask the user to choose: (a) reset — archive the old mailbox toloop-archive-<date>/and start fresh; (b) abort; or (c) keep it and initialize this new loop in a sibling directory (loop-<slug>/from the new goal) — the right choice when the existing loop may still be running in another session. If STATE.md saysstatus: runningand LOG.md's last entry is recent, recommend (c) — never hijack a possibly-live mailbox. - Create the mailbox directory with these files:
loop/GOAL.md — from $ARGUMENTS. If arguments are empty or vaguer than one sentence of substance, interview the user briefly (what does done look like, hard constraints, what must NOT change) before writing it. Decide the profile: software (default) or data — choose data when the goal is pipelines, ETL/ELT, SQL models, notebooks, finance/reporting datasets. Structure:
# Goal
profile: software | data
<the mission, in the user's words, sharpened>
## Definition of done
<objectively checkable statements>
## Constraints
<stack, style, things that must not break, budget notes>
For profile: data, the Definition of done MUST include data ground truth, so interview for it if missing: source(s) of truth to reconcile against, tolerated row-count/aggregate deltas, key uniqueness expectations, and whether re-runs must be idempotent. Vague data goals ("clean the dataset") are the #1 cause of runaway loops — pin numbers down.
loop/STATE.md (the mission: line is the first sentence of GOAL.md's mission, verbatim — the /trio orchestrator halts if it ever stops matching GOAL.md, which catches another session repurposing the mailbox):
schema: 1
iteration: 0
max_iterations: 10
status: ready
mission: <first sentence of the goal, verbatim>
## Approaches tried and rejected
(append-only; the Lead adds one line per dead end, with why)
## Key decisions and rationale
(append-only)
loop/LOG.md with a # Trio loop log header line, and empty loop/PLAN.md, loop/REPORT.md, loop/VERDICT.md.
- If the project is a git repo, ask the user whether
loop/should be gitignored (ephemeral) or committed (auditable history). Default suggestion: commit it. - Confirm setup and print next steps:
/triofor a single supervised iteration (recommended first), then/loop /trioto run autonomously — if the mailbox is notloop/, say to pass it:/trio dir=<path>and/loop /trio dir=<path>. Mention Esc stops the loop, and GOAL.md +max_iterationsin STATE.md are the two human control knobs while it runs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 46 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 765cdfa265ec
trio-init is a skill published in the GitHub repository albiol2004/trio-agent-loop (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 807 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
crit-cli
Use when an agent needs to author or reply to crit inline comments programmatically (including multi-agent workflows commenting on shared code/plans/docs/proposals), publish or unpublish a crit review with crit share, sync a crit review to or from a GitHub PR or GitLab MR, or read/interpret a crit review JSON file.…
crit
Review code changes, a plan, a live page (running dev server), or a local HTML file with Crit inline comments and structured human feedback. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /crit or directly asks to use Crit; a generic review request does not count.
crit-story
Author a crit story only when the user explicitly invokes crit-story or directly asks you to generate a crit story. Do not infer this skill from generic review, PR, or diff-review requests.
linked-intent-dev
Guide for linked-intent development (LID). Consult for ALL code changes. Walks changes through a mode-aware six-phase workflow (HLD → LLD → EARS → intent-narrowing edge audit → tests-first → code) with mandatory stops between each phase. Bugs walk the arrow like any other change — no short-circuit. Enforces cascade…
update-lid
Configure or reconcile a project for linked-intent development (LID). Dispatches on project state — fresh bootstrap, append directives to an existing agent-instructions file (AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md), add missing mode marker, reconcile convention drift, or run mode transitions. Invoked as /update-lid. For fresh…
arrow-maintenance
Navigation and audit overlay for linked-intent development. Use when working with docs/arrows/ — orienting via index.yaml, auditing spec-to-code coherence, detecting reverse orphans and drift, splitting/merging/renaming/re-parenting segments. Dual-mode: ambient guidance when the overlay is present…