Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alea-institute/folio-claude-plugin --skill folio-identify-area-of-lawgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alea-institute/folio-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-claude-plugin/folio-identify-area-of-law)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-claude-plugin/folio-identify-area-of-law"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-claude-plugin/folio-identify-area-of-law/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-claude-plugin/folio-identify-area-of-law"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-claude-plugin/folio-identify-area-of-law.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00106 | $0.00453 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00227 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
folio-identify-area-of-law scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to folio-identify-area-of-law — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Identify Areas of Law with FOLIO
Identify the area(s) of law that apply to a legal situation using the FOLIO ontology's areas_of_law taxonomy branch.
Workflow
Given a description of a legal situation or matter, follow these steps:
-
Search for relevant areas: Use
folio:search_conceptswith key legal terms from the situation to find candidate areas of law. -
Browse all areas of law: Use
folio:get_taxonomy_branch("areas_of_law")to review all 31 top-level areas of law. This ensures you do not miss a relevant area that the search might not surface. -
Check sub-specialties: Use
folio:get_children(iri)on promising top-level areas to see if a more specific sub-specialty applies. -
Get full details: Use
folio:get_concept(iri)on each matching area for the complete definition, translations, and cross-references.
Output Format
Return each applicable area of law as:
- FOLIO Label: The official FOLIO concept name
- FOLIO IRI: The concept's unique identifier (e.g.,
https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/...) - Definition: The FOLIO definition of this area of law
- Relevance: primary (directly applicable) or secondary (tangentially related)
- Reasoning: Brief explanation of why this area applies to the situation
List primary areas first, then secondary areas. Most situations involve 1-3 primary areas and 0-2 secondary areas.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 33 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A cbbf60cfba6d
folio-identify-area-of-law is a skill published in the GitHub repository alea-institute/folio-claude-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 453 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to folio-identify-area-of-law, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…