folio-classify-industry

folio-classify-industry is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from alea-institute/folio-mcp. It costs 81 tokens per session (430 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An industry-classification skill that matches a company, client, or legal matter to sectors in FOLIO, a legal information taxonomy with 21 top-level industries.

In plain words
What is it for?
Classifying matters or clients into areas such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, technology, energy, or professional services.
Why use it?
It provides a consistent industry label and includes the official concept identifier, definition, and parent sector.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Classifying matters or clients into areas such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, technology, energy, or professional services.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-classify-industry
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add alea-institute/folio-mcp --skill folio-classify-industry
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alea-institute/folio-mcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for folio-classify-industry

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-classify-industry/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-classify-industry)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-classify-industry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-classify-industry/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for folio-classify-industry

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-classify-industry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-classify-industry.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 81 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 430 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00081 $0.00430
Opus 5 $0.00041 $0.00215
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00086
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00043

Measured 12d ago against content hash f64ad1412f05, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

folio-classify-industry scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/folio-classify-industry/SKILL.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

Classify an Industry with FOLIO

Classify the industry sector for a matter or client against the FOLIO ontology's industries taxonomy branch.

Workflow

Given a company, client, or matter description, follow these steps:

  1. Search for matches: Use folio:search_concepts with the company name, industry terms, or business description to find candidate industry types in FOLIO.

  2. Browse the industry taxonomy: Use folio:get_taxonomy_branch("industries") to review all 21 top-level industry sectors (e.g., Finance and Insurance, Health Care, Manufacturing, Professional Services, etc.).

  3. Drill into the best sector: Use folio:get_children(iri) on the most promising top-level sector to find the specific sub-industry.

  4. Get full details: Use folio:get_concept(iri) on the best match to retrieve the complete definition, translations, identifiers, and cross-references.

Output Format

Return the classification as:

  • FOLIO Label: The official FOLIO concept name
  • FOLIO IRI: The concept's unique identifier (e.g., https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/...)
  • Definition: The FOLIO definition of this industry
  • Parent Sector: The parent industry sector (if classifying a sub-industry)
  • Confidence: high / medium / low
  • Reasoning: Brief explanation of why this classification was chosen

If the matter spans multiple industries (e.g., a fintech company), list all applicable industries with primary/secondary relevance.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 34 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A f64ad1412f05

Subscribe to this mod's changes

folio-classify-industry is a skill published in the GitHub repository alea-institute/folio-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 430 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens