agentmods.dev

folio-identify-engagement-terms

folio-identify-engagement-terms is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from alea-institute/folio-mcp. It costs 88 tokens per session (463 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A tool for matching legal-service billing and engagement arrangements to the FOLIO terminology system. Engagement terms describe how a client and legal provider agree to work and get paid.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify fee models, invoice terms, engagement arrangements, sources of business, and other applicable terms, including their official labels and definitions.
Why use it?
It turns informal descriptions such as hourly billing or a fixed fee into consistent legal terms that can be searched and compared.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

not rated 5repo 7mo ago A scan 88 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to identify fee models, invoice terms, engagement arrangements, sources of business, and other applicable terms, including their official labels and definitions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-engagement-terms
View source ↗ alea-institute/folio-mcp
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add alea-institute/folio-mcp --skill folio-identify-engagement-terms
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alea-institute/folio-mcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for folio-identify-engagement-terms

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-engagement-terms/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-engagement-terms)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-engagement-terms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-engagement-terms/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for folio-identify-engagement-terms

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-engagement-terms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-engagement-terms.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 88 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 463 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00088 $0.00463
Opus 5.5 $0.00035 $0.00185
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00093
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00046

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 477c58f6394a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

folio-identify-engagement-terms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/folio-identify-engagement-terms/SKILL.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

Identify Engagement Terms with FOLIO

Identify the engagement terms for a legal services arrangement using the FOLIO ontology's engagement_terms taxonomy branch.

Workflow

Given a description of a legal services arrangement or billing structure, follow these steps:

  1. Search for matches: Use folio:search_concepts with terms describing the fee structure, billing arrangement, or engagement type to find candidates in FOLIO.

  2. Browse the engagement terms taxonomy: Use folio:get_taxonomy_branch("engagement_terms") to review all 14 top-level categories (e.g., Engagement Fee Model, Engagement Fee Detail, Invoice Terms, Engagement Arrangements, Source of Business, etc.).

  3. Drill into relevant categories: Use folio:get_children(iri) on the most relevant categories to find specific terms (e.g., hourly rates, fixed fees, contingency fees, blended rates).

  4. Get full details: Use folio:get_concept(iri) on each match for the complete definition, translations, identifiers, and cross-references.

Output Format

Return each applicable engagement term as:

  • FOLIO Label: The official FOLIO concept name
  • FOLIO IRI: The concept's unique identifier (e.g., https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/...)
  • Definition: The FOLIO definition of this term
  • Parent Category: The top-level engagement terms category
  • Relevance: primary (directly describes the arrangement) or secondary (related or implied)
  • Reasoning: Brief explanation of why this term applies

Most arrangements involve terms from multiple categories (e.g., a fee model plus invoice terms plus engagement arrangement). List all applicable terms grouped by category.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 477c58f6394a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

folio-identify-engagement-terms is a skill published in the GitHub repository alea-institute/folio-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 463 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Legal and compliance
Related

folio-identify-engagement-terms compared with skills from other repositories

folio-identify-engagement-terms next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
folio-identify-engagement-termsalea-institute/folio-mcpSkill57mo agoMITA88Claude Code, Codex
fto-triageanthropics/claude-for-legalSkill9.9k3d agoApache-2.0A81Claude Code
legal-holdanthropics/claude-for-legalSkill9.9k3d agoApache-2.0A68Claude Code
specification-writingwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepSkill19k3d agoMITA49Claude Code
terms-of-servicegenspark-ai/genofficeSkill12kyesterdayApache-2.0A32Claude Code, Codex
x-scorecardx-cmd/x-cmdSkill4.7k7d agoApache-2.0A57Claude Code, Codex
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agbKlotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtSkill1.8kyesterdayApache-2.0A69Claude Code