Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alea-institute/folio-mcp --skill folio-identify-forum-venuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alea-institute/folio-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-forum-venue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-forum-venue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-forum-venue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-forum-venue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-forum-venue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.00508 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00254 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
folio-identify-forum-venue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Identify a Forum or Venue with FOLIO
Identify the appropriate forum, venue, or governmental body using the FOLIO ontology's forum_venues and governmental_bodies taxonomy branches.
Workflow
Given a description of a legal dispute or regulatory matter, follow these steps:
-
Search for matches: Use
folio:search_conceptswith terms describing the forum, court, or regulatory body to find candidates in FOLIO. -
Browse forums and venues: Use
folio:get_taxonomy_branch("forum_venues")to see dispute forums (courts, tribunals), stock exchanges, and dispute venues. -
Browse governmental bodies: Use
folio:get_taxonomy_branch("governmental_bodies")to see federal, state, local, county, tribal, multinational, and regulatory bodies. -
Drill into the best matches: Use
folio:get_children(iri)on the most relevant categories to find specific forums or bodies. -
Get full details: Use
folio:get_concept(iri)on each match for the complete definition, translations, identifiers, and cross-references.
Output Format
Return each applicable forum or body as:
- FOLIO Label: The official FOLIO concept name
- FOLIO IRI: The concept's unique identifier (e.g.,
https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/...) - Definition: The FOLIO definition of this forum or body type
- Branch:
forum_venues(courts, tribunals, exchanges) orgovernmental_bodies(agencies, regulators) - Relevance: primary (most likely forum) or secondary (alternative or related)
- Reasoning: Brief explanation of why this forum or body applies
If multiple forums could apply (e.g., federal vs. state court, or court vs. arbitration), list all with their relevance.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 36 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 4edaf7396b91
folio-identify-forum-venue is a skill published in the GitHub repository alea-institute/folio-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 508 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…