folio-identify-objective

folio-identify-objective is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from alea-institute/folio-mcp. It costs 87 tokens per session (439 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A legal-objective finder based on FOLIO, a taxonomy for organizing legal concepts. It matches a matter to objectives such as litigation, transactions, regulation, risk management, or fiduciary duty.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify applicable legal objectives, explore related categories, and return each objective with its official name, identifier, definition, translations, and cross-references.
Why use it?
It removes the need to search through a broad legal vocabulary manually or guess which objective labels fit a matter.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to identify applicable legal objectives, explore related categories, and return each objective with its official name, identifier, definition, translations, and cross-references.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-objective
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add alea-institute/folio-mcp --skill folio-identify-objective
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alea-institute/folio-mcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for folio-identify-objective

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-objective/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-objective)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-objective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-objective/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for folio-identify-objective

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-objective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alea-institute/folio-mcp/folio-identify-objective.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 87 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 439 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00087 $0.00439
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.00219
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00088
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00044

Measured 10d ago against content hash 0e0ce199c330, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

folio-identify-objective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/folio-identify-objective/SKILL.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

Identify the legal objectives for a matter using the FOLIO ontology's objectives taxonomy branch.

Workflow

Given a description of a legal matter, follow these steps:

  1. Search for matches: Use folio:search_concepts with key legal terms from the matter to find candidate objectives in FOLIO.

  2. Browse the objectives taxonomy: Use folio:get_taxonomy_branch("objectives") to review all 13 top-level objective categories (e.g., Litigation Objectives, Transactional Objectives, Regulatory Objectives, Risk Management, Fiduciary Duty, etc.).

  3. Drill into relevant categories: Use folio:get_children(iri) on the most relevant categories to find specific objectives (e.g., specific claims, defenses, remedies, or filing types).

  4. Get full details: Use folio:get_concept(iri) on each match for the complete definition, translations, identifiers, and cross-references.

Output Format

Return each applicable objective as:

  • FOLIO Label: The official FOLIO concept name
  • FOLIO IRI: The concept's unique identifier (e.g., https://folio.openlegalstandard.org/...)
  • Definition: The FOLIO definition of this objective
  • Parent Category: The top-level objective category
  • Relevance: primary (central to the matter) or secondary (supporting or related)
  • Reasoning: Brief explanation of why this objective applies

Most matters involve 2-5 objectives across one or more categories. List primary objectives first, then secondary ones.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 34 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 0e0ce199c330

Subscribe to this mod's changes

folio-identify-objective is a skill published in the GitHub repository alea-institute/folio-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 439 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens