Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aleksbuss/orchestra --skill incremental-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aleksbuss/orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01992 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00797 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
incremental-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to incremental-implementation — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 250 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incremental Implementation
Overview
Build in thin vertical slices — implement one piece, test it, verify it, then expand. Avoid implementing an entire feature in one pass. Each increment should leave the system in a working, testable state. This is the execution discipline that makes large features manageable.
When to Use
- Implementing any multi-file change
- Building a new feature from a task breakdown
- Refactoring existing code
- Any time you're tempted to write more than ~100 lines before testing
When NOT to use: Single-file, single-function changes where the scope is already minimal.
The Increment Cycle
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ Implement ──→ Test ──→ Verify ──┐ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ └───── Commit ◄─────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ Next slice │
│ │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
For each slice:
- Implement the smallest complete piece of functionality
- Test — run the test suite (or write a test if none exists)
- Verify — confirm the slice works as expected (tests pass, build succeeds, manual check)
- Commit -- save your progress with a descriptive message (see
git-workflow-and-versioningfor atomic commit guidance) - Move to the next slice — carry forward, don't restart
Slicing Strategies
Vertical Slices (Preferred)
Build one complete path through the stack:
Slice 1: Create a task (DB + API + basic UI)
→ Tests pass, user can create a task via the UI
Slice 2: List tasks (query + API + UI)
→ Tests pass, user can see their tasks
Slice 3: Edit a task (update + API + UI)
→ Tests pass, user can modify tasks
Slice 4: Delete a task (delete + API + UI + confirmation)
→ Tests pass, full CRUD complete
Each slice delivers working end-to-end functionality.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 250 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 960f2ed08ccd
incremental-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository aleksbuss/orchestra (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,992 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to incremental-implementation, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ama-memory
Use AMA memory in OpenClaw to recall prior context, capture turns, inspect stored state, end sessions, or delete a user's memory when asked.
data-analysis
A careful workflow for working with table-like files such as CSV, Excel, TSV, JSON, and Parquet. It requires inspecting the data before writing small analysis steps, then checking each result.
deep-research
Use this skill for any task that requires in-depth research, investigation, or comprehensive report generation on a topic. This includes: producing industry analysis, market research, technology surveys, competitive intelligence, trend reports, or any deliverable that synthesizes information from multiple sources into…
cg-work-memory
Use when a local agent needs to submit a concise public work-memory report for its own completed local task through cg report work-memory.
security-audit
Auditoria de segurança aplicada (AppSec). Varre código, dependências e configurações contra OWASP Top 10 / CWE Top 25, identifica segredos expostos, valida controles de auth/authz e gera relatório priorizado. Use para "revisar segurança", "auditar vulnerabilidades", "threat modeling" ou "security review".
squad-bootstrap
Skill de inicialização da squad. Faz a varredura do projeto e popula a memória técnica e de negócios em memories/. ATENÇÃO - SÓ DEVE ser executada se houver solicitação explícita do usuário ("instalar a squad", "fazer setup inicial", "bootstrap do projeto") ou logo após o instalador (install.sh) ter configurado a…