Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementationnpx skills add aleksbuss/orchestra --skill incremental-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aleksbuss/orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/incremental-implementation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.01992 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00996 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
incremental-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to incremental-implementation — 16 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 250 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incremental Implementation
Overview
Build in thin vertical slices — implement one piece, test it, verify it, then expand. Avoid implementing an entire feature in one pass. Each increment should leave the system in a working, testable state. This is the execution discipline that makes large features manageable.
When to Use
- Implementing any multi-file change
- Building a new feature from a task breakdown
- Refactoring existing code
- Any time you're tempted to write more than ~100 lines before testing
When NOT to use: Single-file, single-function changes where the scope is already minimal.
The Increment Cycle
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ Implement ──→ Test ──→ Verify ──┐ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ └───── Commit ◄─────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ Next slice │
│ │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
For each slice:
- Implement the smallest complete piece of functionality
- Test — run the test suite (or write a test if none exists)
- Verify — confirm the slice works as expected (tests pass, build succeeds, manual check)
- Commit -- save your progress with a descriptive message (see
git-workflow-and-versioningfor atomic commit guidance) - Move to the next slice — carry forward, don't restart
Slicing Strategies
Vertical Slices (Preferred)
Build one complete path through the stack:
Slice 1: Create a task (DB + API + basic UI)
→ Tests pass, user can create a task via the UI
Slice 2: List tasks (query + API + UI)
→ Tests pass, user can see their tasks
Slice 3: Edit a task (update + API + UI)
→ Tests pass, user can modify tasks
Slice 4: Delete a task (delete + API + UI + confirmation)
→ Tests pass, full CRUD complete
Each slice delivers working end-to-end functionality.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 250 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 960f2ed08ccd
incremental-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository aleksbuss/orchestra (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,992 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to incremental-implementation, differing in 16 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-analysis
当任务以表格数据为中心(CSV/Excel/TSV/JSON/Parquet)并需要分析、清洗、聚合、可视化、导出时,必须使用本技能。该技能强调人类数据分析师式流程:先多轮探查数据,再分段写小块 Python 代码逐步求解。禁止跳过探查直接编码,禁止一次写大段复杂代码。.
deep-research
Use this skill for any task that requires in-depth research, investigation, or comprehensive report generation on a topic. This includes: producing industry analysis, market research, technology surveys, competitive intelligence, trend reports, or any deliverable that synthesizes information from multiple sources into…
tui-smoke-test-with-tmux
Verify and debug this project's ratatui/crossterm TUI by running the ACN agent CLI inside tmux, capturing terminal screens as text, sending scripted keys, checking stderr, and writing focused tmux regressions for requested TUI flows. Use after changes to src/sessiontui, src/bin/acn.rs interactive mode, terminal…
code-review
Multi-pass code review. Review changes locally, then run codex exec --json as an independent read-only reviewer and merge the findings. Use before merging or after significant refactoring.
verify
Run ACN's full Rust verification — formatting, Clippy, tests, and type checking — plus the canonical tmux smoke test when interactive TUI behavior is affected.
ama-memory
Use AMA memory in OpenClaw to recall prior context, capture turns, inspect stored state, end sessions, or delete a user's memory when asked.