Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alex-alecu/garden-desk --skill prior-authorization-document-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alex-alecu/garden-deskWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alex-alecu/garden-desk/prior-authorization-document-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alex-alecu/garden-desk/prior-authorization-document-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alex-alecu/garden-desk/prior-authorization-document-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alex-alecu/garden-desk/prior-authorization-document-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alex-alecu/garden-desk/prior-authorization-document-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00272 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00136 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
prior-authorization-document-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use only the supplied packet, payer policy, checklist, and user criteria. If no policy or checklist is supplied, inventory the packet and ask for the controlling requirements. Do not use model memory as a payer rule.
Map each supplied requirement to exact packet evidence. Use only documented, not documented, conflicting, not applicable, and human review required. Do not use met, failed, approve, or deny.
Record request identifier, patient identifier needed to distinguish the packet, provider, payer, requested item or service as written, dates, attached document types, supplied criterion, evidence location, and state. Do not interpret medical necessity, symptoms, diagnoses, treatment, code validity, or clinical importance.
Output one table: supplied requirement; state; source fact; evidence location; missing or conflicting item; human check. Route missing evidence to human review; it does not prove a failed criterion or delayed care. Require qualified medical-administration and clinical review before submission or use in a care decision. This skill does not claim HIPAA compliance or decide medical necessity, coverage, approval, or denial.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 13 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A ca2e198d80ff
prior-authorization-document-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository alex-alecu/garden-desk (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 272 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
redact-pii
Redact personal data from a document through the connected Superlinked MCP edge before working with the content. Use when the user asks to redact, anonymize, scrub, de-identify, or remove PII/sensitive data from a document.
meta-pdf-reformat-pipeline
Modernize a legacy PDF: structural extraction → natural-language rewrite of problem pages → audit summary → re-merge into the final PDF.
legal-writer
Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification…
audit-export
Export the full CocoAudit trail as a stakeholder-ready compliance document.
contract-analyzer
OCR a contract PDF with mistralocr, then extract structured clauses and risk scores with mistralchat + jsonschema. Use when the user provides a contract document to analyze for risks, obligations, and key terms.
signature-request
Pre-signature gate and routing plan for a finalized document — verifies exact legal entity names, signatory authority, attached exhibits, filled blanks, consistent dates, and counterparty details, then sets the signing order (sequential vs. parallel, with reasons), writes envelope instructions for any e-sign tool, and…