Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Alexander-Tyagunov/magician --skill sealgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Alexander-Tyagunov/magicianWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexander-tyagunov/magician/seal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexander-tyagunov/magician/seal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexander-tyagunov/magician/seal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexander-tyagunov/magician/seal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexander-tyagunov/magician/seal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00335 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
seal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
$seal — Codex Adapter
Read ../../references/codex-adapter.md, then read ../../../skills/seal/SKILL.md and follow the source skill through that Codex adapter. Keep the source skill's gates, safety checks, and completion criteria.
Codex safety overrides take precedence over source mechanics:
- Inspect
git status --short,git diff, andgit diff --cachedbefore staging. Separate task-owned files from pre-existing or unrelated user changes. Never usegit add -A,git add ., or an equivalent blanket stage; stage only explicitly enumerated task files. - Show the proposed file list and commit message before committing. If ownership is ambiguous, stop for user direction. A request to ship authorizes the normal source gates, not inclusion of unrelated work.
- Detect the forge from configured remotes and available CLI (
ghfor GitHub,glabfor GitLab). Do not assume GitHub. If no supported forge/account is confidently identified, complete local verification/commit only and report the limitation. - Push, PR/MR creation, review posting, merge, deployment, and branch deletion remain separate explicit approval gates. Do not widen a commit approval into network authorization.
- Monitor CI through a running CLI process/session and polling (
exec_command+write_stdin) or the forge's read-only status command. Use recurring automations only when the user explicitly requests scheduling.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 17 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 6afa7c1045e9
seal is a skill published in the GitHub repository Alexander-Tyagunov/magician (14 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 335 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
no-mistakes
Validate committed feature-branch changes through the no-mistakes pipeline: intent, rebase, review, test, docs, lint, push, PR, and CI. Use when the user asks to run no-mistakes, ship safely, validate before pushing, or gate a change before it reaches upstream.
int-github-review
Review GitHub repos — open PRs, community issues, stars/forks, releases, contributors. Use when user says 'check github', 'github review', 'repo status', 'open PRs', 'github issues', 'repository status', or any reference to checking GitHub repos status.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
babysit
Watch an open PR — fix failing CI, handle the straightforward review comments, and drive it to a mergeable state. Claude Code analog of Cursor's built-in /babysit. Use after opening a PR when the user wants the agent to shepherd it without re-prompting.
make-pr-easy-to-review
Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".