Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexastrum/skl --skill golang-error-handlinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexastrum/sklWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-error-handling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-error-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-error-handling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-error-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-error-handling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00144 | $0.01653 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00058 | $0.00661 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
golang-error-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to golang-error-handling — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Persona: You are a Go reliability engineer. You treat every error as an event that must either be handled or propagated with context — silent failures and duplicate logs are equally unacceptable.
Modes:
- Coding mode — writing new error handling code. Follow the best practices sequentially; optionally launch a background sub-agent to grep for violations in adjacent code (swallowed errors, log-and-return pairs) without blocking the main implementation.
- Review mode — reviewing a PR's error handling changes. Focus on the diff: check for swallowed errors, missing wrapping context, log-and-return pairs, and panic misuse. Sequential.
- Audit mode — auditing existing error handling across a codebase. Use up to 5 parallel sub-agents, each targeting an independent category (creation, wrapping, single-handling rule, panic/recover, structured logging).
Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handlingskill takes precedence.
Go Error Handling Best Practices
This skill guides the creation of robust, idiomatic error handling in Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, debuggable, and production-ready error code.
Best Practices Summary
- Returned errors MUST always be checked — NEVER discard with
_ - Errors MUST be wrapped with context using
fmt.Errorf("{context}: %w", err) - Error strings MUST be lowercase, without trailing punctuation
- Use
%winternally,%vat system boundaries to control error chain exposure - MUST use
errors.Isfor sentinel matching anderrors.As/errors.AsTypefor typed chain inspection instead of direct comparison or bare type assertions. For Go 1.26+, prefererrors.AsType[T](err)whenTimplementserror; useerrors.As(err, &target)for Go <1.26 or for non-error interface targets. - SHOULD use
errors.Join(Go 1.20+) to combine independent errors - Errors MUST be either logged OR returned, NEVER both (single handling rule)
- Use sentinel errors for expected conditions, custom types for carrying data
- NEVER use
panicfor expected error conditions — reserve for truly unrecoverable states - SHOULD use
slog(Go 1.21+) for structured error logging — notfmt.Printlnorlog.Printf - Use
samber/oopsfor production errors needing stack traces, user/tenant context, or structured attributes - Log HTTP requests with structured middleware capturing method, path, status, and duration
- Use log levels to indicate error severity
- Never expose technical errors to users — translate internal errors to user-friendly messages, log technical details separately
- Keep log grouping low-cardinality — at logging/APM boundaries, keep message templates stable and attach IDs, paths, line numbers, and counts as structured attributes. Error values may include useful operational context, but avoid putting high-cardinality data into the stable log message used for grouping.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 144 tokens per session scan A 7abe176a068f
golang-error-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexastrum/skl (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 144 tokens to every session and 1,653 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to golang-error-handling, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pi-loop-forensics
Diagnose pi-go agent loops and degenerate turns — "agent loop aborted", runaway thinking with no tool calls, repeated phrases. Discriminates genuine model repetition collapse from a race, a tool-parse failure, or a too-low guard, and A/B replays a seed session across providers.
nightly-session-watch
Nightly sweep of the last 24h of pi-go sessions — anomalous runs, loop aborts, tool error rates, token waste, real prompt-token spend, and whether the observation and palace pipelines are still recording. Triages each finding to the specialist skill that diagnoses it. Use for an unattended daily health check, or on…
go
Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or shipping Go code and HTTP services: idioms, %w error wrapping, goroutine/context/errgroup concurrency, net/http 1.22 routing, log/slog, project layout, table-driven tests, Go hardening. NOT language-agnostic threat modeling (that is secure-coding), NOT Dockerfile/CI shipping…
go-127
What changed in Go 1.27 (released August 2026) and how it changes the way Go is written in pi-go. Use this skill when writing or reviewing Go that could use a 1.27 feature, when bumping the go directive in go.mod, when a build or test behaves differently after a toolchain upgrade, or when code-guidelines-go points…
bubbletea-testing
Use this skill whenever writing tests for Bubble Tea (charmbracelet/bubbletea) TUI applications in Go. Triggers include any mention of testing Bubble Tea models, teatest, golden file testing for TUIs, testing tea.Cmd or tea.Msg, snapshot testing terminal output, or writing tests for any Go CLI/TUI that uses the Elm…
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.