Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexastrum/skl --skill golang-samber-oopsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexastrum/sklWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-samber-oops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-samber-oops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-samber-oops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-samber-oops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-samber-oops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02419 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00968 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00484 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00242 |
Grade A, and why
golang-samber-oops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to golang-samber-oops — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 277 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats errors as structured data. Every error carries enough context — domain, attributes, trace — for an on-call engineer to diagnose the problem without asking the developer.
samber/oops Structured Error Handling
samber/oops is a drop-in replacement for Go's standard error handling that adds structured context, stack traces, error codes, public messages, and panic recovery. Variable data goes in .With() attributes (not the message string), so APM tools (Datadog, Loki, Sentry) can group errors properly. Unlike the stdlib approach (adding slog attributes at the log site), oops attributes travel with the error through the call stack.
Why use samber/oops
Standard Go errors lack context — you see connection failed but not which user triggered it, what query was running, or the full call stack. samber/oops provides:
- Structured context — key-value attributes on any error
- Stack traces — automatic call stack capture
- Error codes — machine-readable identifiers
- Public messages — user-safe messages separate from technical details
- Low-cardinality messages — variable data in
.With()attributes, not the message string, so APM tools group errors properly
This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.
Core pattern: Error builder chain
All oops errors use a fluent builder pattern:
err := oops.
In("user-service"). // domain/feature
Tags("database", "postgres"). // categorization
Code("network_failure"). // machine-readable identifier
User("user-123", "email", "[email protected]"). // user context
With("query", query). // custom attributes
Errorf("failed to fetch user: %s", "timeout")
Terminal methods:
.Errorf(format, args...)— create a new error.Wrap(err)— wrap an existing error.Wrapf(err, format, args...)— wrap with a message.Join(err1, err2, ...)— combine multiple errors.Recover(fn)/.Recoverf(fn, format, args...)— convert panic to error
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 277 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A c9ee08ad08ce
golang-samber-oops is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexastrum/skl (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,419 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to golang-samber-oops, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pi-loop-forensics
Diagnose pi-go agent loops and degenerate turns — "agent loop aborted", runaway thinking with no tool calls, repeated phrases. Discriminates genuine model repetition collapse from a race, a tool-parse failure, or a too-low guard, and A/B replays a seed session across providers.
nightly-session-watch
Nightly sweep of the last 24h of pi-go sessions — anomalous runs, loop aborts, tool error rates, token waste, real prompt-token spend, and whether the observation and palace pipelines are still recording. Triages each finding to the specialist skill that diagnoses it. Use for an unattended daily health check, or on…
go
Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or shipping Go code and HTTP services: idioms, %w error wrapping, goroutine/context/errgroup concurrency, net/http 1.22 routing, log/slog, project layout, table-driven tests, Go hardening. NOT language-agnostic threat modeling (that is secure-coding), NOT Dockerfile/CI shipping…
go-127
What changed in Go 1.27 (released August 2026) and how it changes the way Go is written in pi-go. Use this skill when writing or reviewing Go that could use a 1.27 feature, when bumping the go directive in go.mod, when a build or test behaves differently after a toolchain upgrade, or when code-guidelines-go points…
bubbletea-testing
Use this skill whenever writing tests for Bubble Tea (charmbracelet/bubbletea) TUI applications in Go. Triggers include any mention of testing Bubble Tea models, teatest, golden file testing for TUIs, testing tea.Cmd or tea.Msg, snapshot testing terminal output, or writing tests for any Go CLI/TUI that uses the Elm…
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.