Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexastrum/skl --skill golang-stretchr-testifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexastrum/sklWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-stretchr-testify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-stretchr-testify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-stretchr-testify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-stretchr-testify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexastrum/skl/golang-stretchr-testify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.01733 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00866 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
golang-stretchr-testify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to golang-stretchr-testify — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 196 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior and make failures self-explanatory — not to hit coverage targets.
Modes:
- Write mode — adding new tests or mocks to a codebase.
- Review mode — auditing existing test code for testify misuse.
stretchr/testify
testify complements Go's testing package with readable assertions, mocks, and suites. It does not replace testing — always use *testing.T as the entry point.
This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.
assert vs require
Both offer identical assertions. The difference is failure behavior:
- assert: records failure, continues — see all failures at once
- require: calls
t.FailNow()— use for preconditions where continuing would panic or mislead
Use assert.New(t) / require.New(t) for readability. Name them is and must:
func TestParseConfig(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
must := require.New(t)
cfg, err := ParseConfig("testdata/valid.yaml")
must.NoError(err) // stop if parsing fails — cfg would be nil
must.NotNil(cfg)
is.Equal("production", cfg.Environment)
is.Equal(8080, cfg.Port)
is.True(cfg.TLS.Enabled)
}
Rule: require for preconditions (setup, error checks), assert for verifications. Never mix randomly.
Core Assertions
is := assert.New(t)
// Equality
is.Equal(expected, actual) // DeepEqual + exact type
is.NotEqual(unexpected, actual)
is.EqualValues(expected, actual) // converts to common type first
is.EqualExportedValues(expected, actual)
// Nil / Bool / Emptiness
is.Nil(obj) is.NotNil(obj)
is.True(cond) is.False(cond)
is.Empty(collection) is.NotEmpty(collection)
is.Len(collection, n)
// Contains (strings, slices, map keys)
is.Contains("hello world", "world")
is.Contains([]int{1, 2, 3}, 2)
is.Contains(map[string]int{"a": 1}, "a")
// Comparison
is.Greater(actual, threshold) is.Less(actual, ceiling)
is.Positive(val) is.Negative(val)
is.Zero(val)
// Errors
is.Error(err) is.NoError(err)
is.ErrorIs(err, ErrNotFound) // walks error chain
is.ErrorAs(err, &target)
is.ErrorContains(err, "not found")
// Type
is.IsType(&User{}, obj)
is.Implements((*io.Reader)(nil), obj)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 196 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A 9b90e5c1bae4
golang-stretchr-testify is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexastrum/skl (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,733 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to golang-stretchr-testify, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
unit-test
A Go testing workflow for writing unit tests: small tests that check individual functions or components. It supports table-driven cases, where many inputs and expected results are organised in one test, and subtests.
fuzzing-test
A Go testing guide for generating fuzz tests, which repeatedly try varied inputs to find crashes and unexpected behavior. It first checks whether the code is suitable for fuzzing.
golang-testing
Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.
gograph
Go repository intelligence for Claude Code. Use when reading, navigating, editing, reviewing, or refactoring a Go codebase. Exposes 64 query, analysis, and workflow capabilities through the local gograph MCP server, including bounded first-call exploration, AST-aware call graphs, blast-radius analysis, impact, and…
go-127
What changed in Go 1.27 (released August 2026) and how it changes the way Go is written in pi-go. Use this skill when writing or reviewing Go that could use a 1.27 feature, when bumping the go directive in go.mod, when a build or test behaves differently after a toolchain upgrade, or when code-guidelines-go points…
bubbletea-testing
Use this skill whenever writing tests for Bubble Tea (charmbracelet/bubbletea) TUI applications in Go. Triggers include any mention of testing Bubble Tea models, teatest, golden file testing for TUIs, testing tea.Cmd or tea.Msg, snapshot testing terminal output, or writing tests for any Go CLI/TUI that uses the Elm…