Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexei-led/architect --skill tools-code-searchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexei-led/architectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexei-led/architect/tools-code-search)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexei-led/architect/tools-code-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexei-led/architect/tools-code-search/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexei-led/architect/tools-code-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexei-led/architect/tools-code-search.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.01137 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.00455 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00227 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
tools-code-search scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code search and targeted reading
Local search is the first evidence pass. It discovers where the architecture is implemented before heavier tools spend time proving graph or semantic facts.
Evidence dimensions: discovery and lightweight structural context.
When to use
Use during the system-map step and whenever a finding needs scoped file:line support before graph, AST, LSP, or language-tool confirmation. Good questions:
- Where are the entrypoints, deploy units, public interfaces, and package roots?
- Which files mention a domain concept, config key, route, queue, or dependency?
- Which modules import a boundary package or framework type?
- What docs, ADRs, manifests, or ownership files describe intended structure?
- Which exact files should the review read next?
This skill supports architecture-review; it does not assign architecture scores
or make findings by itself.
Commands
Run from the repo root. Prefer fd for paths and rg for text. Use the
runtime's file-read tool for targeted reads after search narrows the scope.
# High-signal structure and intent files
fd -H '(^README|CONTEXT|ARCHITECTURE|adr|decisions|ownership|CODEOWNERS|package.json|pyproject.toml|go.mod|Chart.yaml|kustomization.yaml|Dockerfile|\.github)' .
# Files by language / package marker
fd 'package.json|tsconfig.json|pyproject.toml|requirements.txt|go.mod|main.tf|Chart.yaml|kustomization.yaml'
# Exact concepts, routes, config keys, or dependency names
rg -n --hidden --glob '!{.git,node_modules,dist,build,vendor}/**' 'Order|Payment|Auth|Session|Repository|Controller|Handler|typeorm|sqlalchemy|kafka|redis'
# Import/dependency hints before AST or graph tools
rg -n --glob '!{.git,node_modules,dist,build,vendor}/**' "from ['\"]|import |require\(|package "
# Git-tracked scope, useful for generated/vendor exclusion
git ls-files
# Change hints when GitNexus is missing or stale
git log --name-only --pretty=format: -- <path> | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head
Prefer git grep -n <pattern> when the review should ignore untracked/generated
files and only search the versioned source. If the target is not a git repo,
record that limit and use scoped fd / rg instead.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 7a294d7dc9cb
tools-code-search is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexei-led/architect (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 1,137 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
kirby-debugging-and-tracing
Diagnoses Kirby rendering/runtime issues using MCP runtime rendering, dump traces, and template/snippet/controller indexes. Use when outputs are wrong, errors occur, or tracing execution paths is required.
systematic-debugging
A four-phase method for investigating software bugs and test failures before changing code. It focuses on finding and confirming the underlying cause.
bensz-collect-bugs
A process for recording bugs caused by defects in Bensz skills. It stores a structured local report and can publish one only when the user explicitly asks.
bug-fix-protocol
8-step disciplined bug-fix protocol that treats every production bug as two failures — the code defect itself and the testing system that allowed it through. Use when fixing a production bug, investigating a regression, writing a post-mortem, or auditing a missed defect. Triggers on "fix this bug", "production bug"…
challenge-resolve
Independently review and fix a bounded task through convergence rounds, with evidence-backed closure and explicit stop/remediation decisions. Use for existing implementations, features, problems, or diffs needing adversarial review and repair.
grace-fix
Debug and fix issues in a GRACE 4 project using .grace semantic navigation, assertions, and verification evidence.